目的 比较开放手术及腹腔镜补片修补腹壁切口疝的手术效果,探讨腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术的价值.方法 回顾分析56例腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料.根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组(24例)和开放组(32例),对2组切口疝类型、腹壁缺损大小、手术时间、术后并发症、术后疼痛评分、术后住院时间、复发率等进行对比分析.结果 2组手术时间、术后并发症发生率、术后复发率比较均无显著性差异.腹腔镜组术后疼痛评分、术后住院时间和手术出血量均明显少于开放组.结论 腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术是安全可行的.它可以从腹腔内在原切口薄弱区添加一个MESH,修复缺损,加强腹壁,避免切开原切口,避免分离腹壁组织,具有创伤小、住院时间短、恢复快等优点,符合力学原理,是修补腹壁切口疝的理想术式,特别对于巨大腹壁切口疝优于开放式腹壁切口疝补片修补术.%Objective It is to compare the operation effect of open surgery and laparoscope patch herniorrhaphy on abdominal wall incisional hernia and approach the value of laparoscope abdominal wall incisional hernia herniorrhaphy. Methods The clinical data of 56 patients with abdominal wall incisional hernia who were in our hospital from January 2004 to January 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into laparoscope group ( 24 cases ) and open group ( 32 cases ) according operation manner. The type of incisional hernia, abdominal wall defect size , operation time , postoperative complications, postoperative pain score, postoperative hospitalization time and recurrence rate of the two groups were compared and analyaed. Results There were all no significant differences on operation time, postoperative complications incidence rate and postoperative recurrence rate hetween the two groups. The postoperative pain score, postoperative hospitalization time and operation hemorrhage quantity in laparoscope group were all ohviously less than that in open group. Conclusion Laparoscope abdominal wall incisional hernia herniorrhaphy is safe and feasible. It can add MESH at the unsubstantial area of original cut from peritoneal cavity to restore defect and strengthen abdominal wall. It can avoid cutting open the original cut and separating abdominal wall tissue. It has the virtues such as little trauma, shorter hospitalization time, quick recovery. It accords with mechanics principle and is the ideal operation manner for repairing abdominal wall incisional hernia, especially for the treatment of huge incisional hernia.
展开▼
