目的 比较空气压缩泵雾化吸入方法和氧驱动雾化吸入方法在提高哮喘急性发作患儿治疗效果中的作用.方法 选择60例哮喘急性发作患儿,按就诊先后次序分为对照组和观察组,每组各30例,分别采用空气压缩泵雾化吸入方法和氧驱动雾化吸人方法.比较雾化吸入后两组患儿哮喘治疗的效果.结果 雾化吸入治疗后观察组患儿哮喘治疗有效率高于对照组,两组比较,P＜0.01,差异具有统计学意义.结论 采用氧驱动雾化吸入可较好地改善哮喘患儿缺氧症状,提高氧饱和度,从而提高疾病治疗效果.%Objective To investigate the effects of atomizing inhalation by air compressor pump and oxygen atomizing inhalation on O2 saturation in children with acute asthma. Methods 60 children with acute asthma were equally assigned into observation and control group according to registration sequence: the atomizing inhalation by air compressor pump and oxygen atomizing inhalation on O2 saturation were respectively used. The two groups were compared in respect of curative effect. Results The effectiveness rate in the observational group was higher than that of the control group (P< 0.001). Conclusion Oxygen atomizing inhalation may be more effective in improving the anoxia in asthma children and thus enhancing the curative effects.
展开▼
