The deliberately ignorance of the subjective aspect in“sage’s intention”(圣人之意)and the omission of the interplay of differences are two major problems within the interpretation of“Chinese wisdom”which is supposed to serve as the“other”perspective to western philosophy by Fran?ois Jullien.The two missing aspects indicate the tendency of sacrificing the particularity(differences)for“the unity”.Ultimately,with the“help”of the misunderstanding of the“Chinese wisdom”,the divisions inherently in western philosophy are merely replaced by the hollow homogenization.
展开▼