首页> 外文期刊>浙江大学学报:自然科学英文版 >Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: which is better in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
【24h】

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: which is better in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

机译:体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术:在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中哪种更好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To evaluate the clinic outcome of off-pump coronary bypass grafting (OPCABG) of patients with coronary heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, we collected and analyzed 1998-2002 data on 28 patients with these two diseases who had received off-pump coronary bypass operation in our hospital, and compared with data on those who also had the same two diseases but received on-pump coronary artery bypass at same time. There were no operation-related death;one died of respiratory failure 14 days after operation while staying in hospital; there were more respiratory complications in the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting group (CCABG) than in the OPCABG group; and the PaO2/FiO2 in the CCABG group was higher than that in the OPCABG group during operation because of CPB, but lower than that in the OPCABG group 6-12 hours after operation. OPCABG seemed more suitable than CCABG for coronary artery disease patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to less damage to their oxygen-exchange capability and the fewer respiratory complications.
机译:为了评估冠心病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCABG)的临床结果,我们收集并分析了1998-2002年关于这两种疾病的28例接受非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的患者的数据在我院进行手术,并与同样患有两种疾病但同时接受泵上冠状动脉搭桥术的患者的数据进行比较。没有与手术有关的死亡;住院14天后有1人死于呼吸衰竭。常规冠状动脉搭桥术组(CCABG)比OPCABG组有更多的呼吸并发症。 CCABG组术中PaO2 / FiO2因CPB而高于OPCABG组,但术后6-12小时低于OPCABG组。 OPCABG似乎比CCABG更适合于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的冠心病患者,因为它们的氧交换能力受到的损害较小,呼吸系统并发症更少。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号