不同分娩方式对妊高症孕产妇母婴安全的影响

摘要

AIM:To study the effects of different delivery meth-ods for pregnancy-induced hypertension maternal and child safety. METHODS:80 maternal in our hospital with different delivery methods were analyzed retrospectively and divided into pregnancy-induced hypertension group and the normal maternal group.RE-SULTS:Compared the rate of natural childbirth group between normal maternal group and pregnancy-induced hypertension group,the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05 ). Compared forceps rate between normal maternal group and the pregnancy-induced hypertension group,the difference was not sta-tistically significant (P >0.05).Compared cesarean section rate between normal maternal group and pregnancy-induced hyperten-sion group,the difference was statistically significant (P <0. 05).Compared heart failure rate beteen normal maternal group and pregnancy-induced hypertension group,the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05 ).Compared the postpartum hemorrhage rates between normal maternal group and pregnancy-induced hypertension group,the difference was not statistically significant (P >0.05 ).CONCLUSION:Cesarean section for pregnancy-induced hypertension is a preferred mode of delivery, reducing the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension in pregnant women at a large extent.%目的：研究采用不同分娩方式对妊高症孕产妇母婴安全的影响。方法：选取我院80例采用不同分娩方式的孕产妇的案例进行回顾性分析，分别为妊高症孕产妇组和正常孕产妇组。结果：正常孕产妇组的自然分娩率与妊高症孕产妇组的自然分娩率相比，差异具有统计学意义；正常孕产妇组的产钳率与妊高症孕产妇组的产钳率相比，差异无统计学意义；正常孕产妇组的剖宫产率与妊高症孕产妇组的剖宫产率相比，差异具有统计学意义。正常孕产妇并发心衰率与妊高症孕产妇并发心衰率相比，差异具有统计学意义；正常孕产妇并发产后出血率与妊高症孕产妇并发产后出血率相比，差异无统计学意义。结论：剖宫产为妊高症孕产妇首选的分娩方式，很大程度地降低了妊高症孕产妇的危险。