《说岳全传》辨疑——兼论《说岳全传》与《大宋中兴通俗演义》的关系

摘要

现在对《说岳全传》的认识通行三个基本结论：《说岳全传》的作者是下层文人、故事前后部分差异过大、前身是《大宋中兴通俗演义》等，其实并不准确。通过作品内容自证发现：钱彩是评话艺人、金丰是小书商，文化程度必定不高；《说岳全传》前后部分差异自有原因，实出一人之手；《大宋中兴通俗演义》对《说岳全传》影响极小，甚至《说岳全传》的作者可能就没有看过《大宋中兴通俗演义》。这中间的缘由，可以通过“钱彩原本《说岳全传》”和“今本《说岳全传》”即金丰增订本两个版本的形成来解释。%There are three usual points about The Life story of Yue Fei, such as：the author of The Life story of Yue Fei is a lower level writer ; there are so many differences between the first part and the last part;this novel＇s predecessor is not the Revive of Song Dynasty. On these points, I will use the novel＇s contents. In my opinion,Qian Cai was a storyteller,Jin Feng is a bookseller, their cultural standard was low indoubtly. There are reasons about the differences between the novel＇s first and last part. The influnce form the novel the Revive of Song Dynasty on The Life story of Yue Fei is very little,and Qian Cai even had never seen the novel the Revive of Song Dy- nasty. At the same time,I point out that The Life of Yue Fei has Qian Cai master copy and now copy two conceptions in the first time.