两种不同居家护理干预在冠心病患者中的应用效果研究

摘要

目的:探讨对冠心病患者实施两种不同居家护理干预的效果.方法:将130例冠心病患者随机分为观察组和对照组各65例,观察组采用PDCA循环实施居家护理干预,对照组给予常规家庭护理干预,共干预12个月.结果:两组患者干预后6个月、9个月、12个月治疗依从性、复发率、并发症及干预12个月后患者生活质量比较,观察组明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05,P<0.01).结论:应用PDCA循环实施居家护理干预可提高冠心病患者的治疗依从性,降低复发率,提高患者生存质量.%Objective: 1o study the effect of two different home nursing interventions on patients with coronary neart disease.Methods: 130 patients with coronary heart disease were randomly divided into observation group and control group (65 cases for each group).PDCA home nursing intervention was cyclically applied to the patients in the observation group and conventional home nursing intervention was given to the patients in the control group.The intervention lasted 12 months.Results: The treatment compliance and quality of life of the patients were better, the relapse rate and complications were lower and less after the intervention for 6, 9 and 12 months ( P ＜0.05 ,P ＜0.01 ).Conclusion: The cylical implementation of PDCA home nursing intervention can improve patient's treatment compliance, decrease the recurrence rate so as to improve the quality of life of patients with coronary heart disease.