比较2种部位种植钉支抗推上颌磨牙向远中移动的效果

摘要

Objective:To compare 2 position implant-supported molar distalization systems in clinical application.Methods:25 pa-tients with Class II and mild to moderate crowding dentition were included,18 females and 7 males,aged 15 to 29 years old(22.58 on average ).All the patients were treated with non-extraction method by distalizing the upper molar with micro-implant anchorage.In ex-perimental group(n =12)the micro-implants were inserted on infrazygomatic crest above the maxillary first molar mesial buccal root. In control group(n =13)the micro-implants were inserted on buccal alveolar bone between maxillary second premolar and maxillary first molar.In both groups micro-implants were inserted to distalize the maxillary molars.The displacement patterns of maxillary inci-sors and molars were measured and compared.Results:Successful primary micro-implant placement was obtained in 87.5%(21 /24) of the implantation in control group and 100%(26 /26)in experimental group.The distal movement(mm)of the molars in control and experiment group was 2.29 ±0.96 and 2.91 ±0.96 respectively(P >0.05).Experimental group showed significant intrusive displace-ment of the molars.Horizontal incisor displacement in experimental group was more than that in control group.Conclusion:Micro-im-plant inserted in infrazygomatic crest may facilitate intrusion and distalization of the maxillary molar and incisor.%目的：比较2种位置的微种植钉支抗推磨牙向远中的临床效果。方法：选择安氏Ⅱ类错25例，男7例，女18例，年龄15～29岁，平均22．58岁，牙列轻中度拥挤，面型较好，无明显前突。实验组（n ＝12）于颊侧第一磨牙近中颊根上方颧牙槽嵴处植入微螺钉种植体；对照组（n ＝13）于上颌第一磨牙与第二前磨牙牙根之间植入微螺钉种植体。推磨牙向远中，推力2．5 N。通过临床评价和对比2组矫治前后的头颅侧位定位片评价其治疗效果差异。结果：实验组和对照组微种植体首次植入成功率分别为100％（26/26）和87．5％（21/24）。治疗后上颌磨牙分别后移（2．91±0．96）mm 和（2．29±0．66）mm（P ＞0．05）。实验组磨牙压低的作用优于对照组，切牙唇倾的副作用小于对照组，切牙压入的作用优于对照组。结论：颧牙槽嵴处的微种植钉支抗推磨牙向远中移动较传统颊侧种植钉支抗对磨牙的垂直向压入及对抗切牙唇倾的效果好。