目的:观察快速过敏皮试仪的应用效果。方法:选择我院行头孢菌素皮试的患儿500例,取得家长同意后,均行传统皮试和快速皮试仪皮试,比较两种方法的结果。结果:两种皮试方法阳性率差异无统计学意义,假阳性率有统计学意义,可疑阳性两者差异有显著性意义。结论:儿科患者应采用快速过敏皮试仪进行皮试,可减少假阳性率并显著提高医疗服务满意度,值得推广应用。%Objective:Observe fast allergy skin test instrument application effect.Methods:Choose our line of cephalosporin skin test of 500 cases of children,without obtaining permission from the parents,both traditional skin test and rapid skin test instrument for skin test,compare the results of two methods.Results:There was no statistically significant difference two methods of skin test positive rate,false positive rate was statistically significant,significant positive difference in the suspicious.Conclusion:Fast should be used in patients with pediatric allergy skin test instrument for skin test,can reduce the false positive rate and significantly improve the medical service satisfaction,is worthy of popularization and application.
展开▼