奥运规则与法学研究--初探法学中质与量问题

摘要

The article tries to investigate the relevance between the Olympic rules and law from economic aspect.Based on the description and analysis of the content and change of Olympic rules,it is expected to obtain knowledge and intelligence,and foil the features of j urisprudential study.The main experience can be concluded as follows:Firstly, the Olympic rules concentrate on fair competition, while law pursues the realization of j ustice.What fairness emphasizes is process, whereas j ustice emphasizes the results.Secondly,some of the competition events of Olympics lay emphasis on quality,while others pay attention to quantity,which can be measured by measuring instruments.Once there is a dispute about quality and quantity,the essence of the problem can be settled through the procedure.Thirdly,however the Olympic rules change,they reflect the fact that both rules and concepts are tools of law.%由经济分析的角度，尝试探讨奥运规则和法学之间的关联。借着对奥运规则和变化的描述与分析，希望萃取出一些智识结晶，烘托出法学研究的某些特质。主要的体会，可以简单归纳如次：第一，奥运规则追求的是公平竞赛，法律追求的是实现正义；公平重视过程，而正义重视结果。第二，奥运的竞赛项目，有些着重“质”，有些着重“量”。“量”的多少高低，可以藉度量衡的仪器；一旦对“量”和“质”有争议，就可以透过“程序”来处理量和质的“实质”问题。第三，无论是奥运规则还是规则的变迁，对法学而言，都反映出“规则即工具，概念也是工具”。