论钓鱼执法

摘要

At present, administrative trap investigation can make up for the inadequacy of conventional investigative methods and have realistic rationality in our country because direct evidence can be obtained and play a scale deterrent role. From the perspective of theory and China’s current legal system, administrative trap investigation does not violate the principle of administration according to the law, administrative openness principle, does not violate the principle of good faith and the principle of trust protection, and does not conflict with the specific provision of Chinese law, so there is existential space in China’s current legal system. The followings are the rules that administrative trap investigation ought to comply with: operated by administrative organs and their staff;only the type of providing chance;abide by the principle of proportion;set the approval procedures and not to be harmful to public orders and good custom, etc.%　　在我国目前的客观情况下，钓鱼执法因其能够取得直接证据、发挥规模威慑作用，弥补常规调查手段的不足，因而有现实的合理性。从理论和中国现行法制的角度看，钓鱼执法不违背依法行政原则、行政公开原则，也不必然违背诚实信用原则、信赖保护原则，且与中国法律的具体规定不抵触，因此在中国有法律制度上的存在空间。钓鱼执法的应然运行规则主要是：主体只限于行政机关及其工作人员；只限于机会提供型；符合比例原则；设定批准程序；不有害于公序良俗等。