In recent years,there have been "the claim for damages of fetus" in scholars.Its essence is refers to the natural person shall have the right to demand compensation for violations suffered before birth,the right subject should be a natural person rather than the fetus,and the premise is that personal legal benefits previous have been encroached.The fetus has no civil subject qualification and cannot enjoy civil substantive rights and the claim for damages at all.Therefore,this formulation is wrong and shall be corrected.%近年来,学界出现了"胎儿损害赔偿请求权"的提法,其实质是指自然人对于出生前所遭受的损害有权要求赔偿,权利主体应是自然人而非胎儿,行使赔偿请求权的前提是自然人的先期人身法益遭受了侵害。胎儿不具有民事主体资格,不能享有民事实体权利,在遭受侵害时也就不存在损害赔偿请求权。因此,这一提法不妥,应予纠正。
展开▼