首页> 中文期刊>福建江夏学院学报 >20年来两岸学界关于“生死问题”的不同进路及其比较

20年来两岸学界关于“生死问题”的不同进路及其比较

     

摘要

生死问题构成人生的起点与终点。学界关于“生死问题”的研究有两条线索:第一条是大陆学者段德智与郑晓江等分别基于西方哲学史和中国儒释道精神所做的关于“西方死亡哲学”和“中国生死智慧”的进路,在生死观探讨中,大陆学者也逐渐由生死智慧走向“生命教育”;第二条线索起源于美国的“死亡学”传统,华人学者傅伟勋教授接续此“死亡学”传统并将其创造性的引向台湾学界,这便是“生死学”学科的确立。尽管大陆与台湾关于“生死学”的研究进路不同,但最终都走向“生命关怀”和“生死教育”。%Born and death are the beginning and end of life,which are both key problems for everyone. In twenty years,there are three main different perspectives for life-and-death studies:philosophy of death,life-and-death studies (thanatology),life-and-death education.With a comparative perspective,there are obvious different ways between mainland China and Taiwan on the study of life and death.In mainland China,take Professor Duan Dezhi and Zheng Xiaojiang as an example,their studyies focus on the philosophy of death and the wisdom of life.However,in Taiwan,take professor Fu Weixun as an example,he developed the thanatology to life-and-death studies.Although there are two different ways on life and death study,we still find that they are chasing for the same aim in mainland China and Taiwan.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号