首页> 外文期刊>林业研究(英文版) >Efficiency of sample-based indices for spatial pattern recognition of wild pistachio (Pistacia atlantica) trees in semi-arid woodlands
【24h】

Efficiency of sample-based indices for spatial pattern recognition of wild pistachio (Pistacia atlantica) trees in semi-arid woodlands

机译:基于样本的指数对半干旱林地野生开心果(Pistacia atlantica)树的空间模式识别的效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The efficiency of sample-based indices pro-posed to quantify the spatial distribution of trees is influ-enced by the structure of tree stands, environmental heterogeneity and degree of aggregation. We evaluated 10 commonly used distance-based and 10 density-based indices using two structurally different stands of wild pis-tachio trees in the Zagros woodlands, Iran, to assess the reliability of each in revealing stand structure in wood-lands. All trees were completely stem-mapped in a nearly pure (40 ha) and a mixed (45 ha) stand. First, the inho-mogeneous pair correlation function [g(r)] and the Clark–Evans index (CEI) were used as references to reveal the true spatial arrangement of all trees in these stands. The sampled data were then evaluated using the 20 indices. Sampling was undertaken in a grid based on a square lattice using square plots (30 m 9 30 m) and nearest neighbor distances at the sample points. The g(r) and CEI statistics showed that the wild pistachio trees were aggregated in both stands, although the degree of aggregation was markedly higher in the pure stand. Three distance-and six density-based indices statistically verified that the wild pistachio trees were aggregated in both stands. The dis-tance-based Hines and Hines statistic (ht) and the density-based standardised Morisita (Ip), patchiness (IP) and Cassie (CA) indices revealed aggregation of the trees in the two structurally different stands in the Zagros woodlands and the higher clumping in the pure stand, whereas the other indices were not sensitive enough.
机译:旨在量化树木空间分布的基于样本的索引的效率受林分结构,环境异质性和聚集程度的影响。我们使用伊朗扎格罗斯(Jagros)林地的两种结构不同的野生双树皮立木评估了10种常用的基于距离的指数和10种基于密度的指数,以评估每种在揭示林地林分结构方面的可靠性。所有树木均完全在近乎纯净的(40公顷)和混合(45公顷)的林分中进行茎干映射。首先,非均质对相关函数[g(r)]和克拉克-埃文斯指数(CEI)被用作揭示这些林分中所有树木的真实空间布置的参考。然后使用20个指数评估采样数据。使用方阵图(30 m 9 30 m)和采样点最近邻的距离,在基于方阵的网格中进行采样。 g(r)和CEI统计数据表明,尽管两个纯林中的开心果树的聚集程度均显着较高,但两个开心果树中都聚集了野生开心果树。三个基于距离和六个密度的指数从统计学上验证了两个开心果树都聚集了野生开心果树。基于距离的Hines和Hines统计(ht)以及基于密度的标准化Morisita(Ip),斑驳性(IP)和Cassie(CA)指数揭示了Zagros林地和林地两个结构不同林分中树木的聚集情况。纯林中的丛生性较高,而其他指数不够敏感。

著录项

  • 来源
    《林业研究(英文版)》 |2016年第3期|583-594|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Natural Resources and Environment, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7144165186, Iran;

    Department of Ecosystem Modelling, University of Goettingen, Buesgenweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany;

    Department of Ecosystem Modelling, University of Goettingen, Buesgenweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany;

    Department of Ecosystem Modelling, University of Goettingen, Buesgenweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号