Literature and history can not be separated despite their difference.Essentially, as a human sci-ence, literature is to excavate human soul and shape human image;while as the study of events, history is to de-scribe the course of events and reveal the law of their development.In form, literature pays more attention to beau-ty, while the value of history lies on its reality;but both of them pursue goodness.Functionally, literature has great influence on casting the souls of people, while history takes history as a mirror and lays emphasis on action.Some comments on ancient history and novel are lack of creation.Some authors do not read original works.Reasons for these are some authors are eager for quick success with impetuous attitude of study.%文史不分家，也有区别：从本质上看，文学是人学，是挖掘人的灵魂和塑造人的形象的；而史学是事学，是记述事件的发展过程并揭示其发展规律的；从表现形式上看，文学重在美，史学贵在真，两者共同追求的都是善；从功能上看，文学对人的影响是铸造灵魂，融化在血液中，而史学则是以史为鉴，落实在行动上。我在写历史小说的过程当中，当然就得看一些古典历史小说方面的评论。感觉一是某些文章雷同，新意少，有“软剽窃”之嫌；二是不看原著，“炒章句”，某些文章简直就是拼盘。这是我从史学角度来看古典文学研究方面存在的问题。这些问题古代史研究中也屡见不鲜。皆急功近利，学风浮躁所至。
展开▼
