警惕刑事二审功能的异化--以法官为分析对象

摘要

It has been suggested that the function of resolving the conflicts is taking the place of the supervising and error correcting function in the criminal appeal procedure,through the empirical study of the cases of the intermediate court.One of the most important reasons is the triple roles a judge played on the trial.This should be paid additional importance to,as it has been affecting other proce-dures.Within the framework of the existing system,the spreading of the above trend presents and cre-ates new alienation:the arraignment system is redesigned,and the choice of the second instance court also produces change,and the court’s evaluation mechanism has also been seriously distorted.%传统刑事二审的功能以监督和纠错为主，但是通过对某中级人民法院刑事二审中的改判、发回、调撤案件进行实证分析后发现，传统的监督和纠错功能逐渐被弱化，而矛盾化解功能凸显。将二审程序中的法官作为研究对象来看，这是其扮演的“法律职业人”“政治权力人”以及“社会文化人”三种角色共同作用的结果。在现有的制度框架内，这种趋势呈现出蔓延之势，产生了新的异化：提讯制度被重新设计，二审开庭的选择也发生变化，而且法院的考评机制也被严重扭曲。