首页> 中文期刊> 《北京行政学院学报》 >马克思“哲学革命”与其“哲学立新”的共时性

马克思“哲学革命”与其“哲学立新”的共时性

         

摘要

It is of great academic significance for the clarification of the true or real nature of MARX’s“revolution in philosophy”and the correct definition of its starting point to understand or comprehend the relation between MARX’s“revolution in philosophy”and his“creation in a new philosophy”. According to the author’s thorough thinking and discrimination, it can be affirmed that MARX’s“revolution in philosophy”and his“creation in a new philosophy”, consistent with the time each other, are interrelated, in⁃terdependent and mutually conditional. Hence, it is inappropriate that both are deemed as two events or two processes occurring suc⁃cessively or in progress. His course of“revolution in philosophy”by no means really started after his“creation in a new philosophy”was accomplished, but started, carried out and deepened synchronously with the latter. MARX’s“creation in a new philosophy”is a process and so is his“revolution in philosophy”, while both processes have identical starting point. Clarifying these facts may con⁃tribute to a profound understanding of the“revolution in philosophy”sponsored by MARX and its characteristics, to an elimination of the negative influence of so-called“theory of one-time completion”about MARX’s“revolution in philosophy”prevalent in aca⁃demia for a long time, to a restoration of the true colours of intellectual history of MARX, and to a promotion of the research of history of marxist philosophy in academia.%深刻理解马克思“哲学革命”与其“哲学立新”的关系,对于澄清马克思“哲学革命”的真实性质,正确界定其起点,有重大学术意义。通过深入思考、辨析,可以确认:马克思的“哲学革命”与其“哲学立新”是相互关联、相互依存、互为条件的,二者在时间上一致,将它们认定为先后发生或进行的两个事件或两个过程是不妥的。他的“哲学革命”的历程,绝不是在其“哲学立新”完成后才真正开启,而是与后者同时开启、同步进行和深化。马克思的“哲学立新”是一个过程,其“哲学革命”同样是一个过程,二者的起点完全相同。澄清这些事实,有助于深刻认识马克思所发动的“哲学革命”及其特征,消除学界长期以来流行的所谓“马克思‘哲学革命’一次完成论”的消极影响,恢复马克思思想史的本来面目,推进学界的马克思主义哲学史研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号