目的:观察针刺是否可以提高西药对慢性前列腺炎的临床疗效.方法:110例慢性前列腺炎患者随机分为治疗组80例和对照组30例,根据前段尿、中段尿、前列腺液(EPS)及按摩后尿液(VB3)细菌培养评估临床疗效.结果:治疗组痊愈率和总有效率均高于对照组(43/80 vs 10/30,P<0.01;75/80 vs 25/30,P<0.05),治疗组中的细菌性CP和无菌性CP的疗效无明显差异(P>0.05),对照组中细菌性CP疗效明显优于无菌性CP.结论:针药结合治疗方法是治疗无菌性CP的较好方法.%Objective: To investigate if acupuncture can improve the curative effect of Western medicine on chronic prostatitis(CP). Methods: One hundred and ten patients with chronic prostatitis were randomly allocated to a treatment group of 80 cases and a control group of 30 cases. The clinical effects were evaluated according to cultures of bacteria in early-stream urine, midstream urine, prostate secretion(EPS) and after-massage urine(VB3). Results: Both the cure rate and the total efficacy rate were higher in the treatment group than in the control group(43/80 vs 10/30,P< 0.01; 75/80 vs 25/30, P< 0.05). In the treatment group there was no significant difference in curative effect between bacterial CP and nonbacterial CP(P > 0.05). In the control group the curative effect on bacterial CP was significantly superior to that on nonbacterial CP. Conclusion: Treatment with combined acupuncture and medicine is a good therapy for nonbacterial CP.
展开▼
机译:目的:观察针刺是否可以提高西药对慢性前列腺炎的临床疗效.方法:110例慢性前列腺炎患者随机分为治疗组80例和对照组30例,根据前段尿、中段尿、前列腺液(EPS)及按摩后尿液(VB3)细菌培养评估临床疗效.结果:治疗组痊愈率和总有效率均高于对照组(43/80 vs 10/30,P<0.01;75/80 vs 25/30,P<0.05),治疗组中的细菌性CP和无菌性CP的疗效无明显差异(P>0.05),对照组中细菌性CP疗效明显优于无菌性CP.结论:针药结合治疗方法是治疗无菌性CP的较好方法.%Objective: To investigate if acupuncture can improve the curative effect of Western medicine on chronic prostatitis(CP). Methods: One hundred and ten patients with chronic prostatitis were randomly allocated to a treatment group of 80 cases and a control group of 30 cases. The clinical effects were evaluated according to cultures of bacteria in early-stream urine, midstream urine, prostate secretion(EPS) and after-massage urine(VB3). Results: Both the cure rate and the total efficacy rate were higher in the treatment group than in the control group(43/80 vs 10/30,P< 0.01; 75/80 vs 25/30, P< 0.05). In the treatment group there was no significant difference in curative effect between bacterial CP and nonbacterial CP(P > 0.05). In the control group the curative effect on bacterial CP was significantly superior to that on nonbacterial CP. Conclusion: Treatment with combined acupuncture and medicine is a good therapy for nonbacterial CP.
展开▼