objective To compare the clinical effect of laparoscopic and open surgery of colon cancer. Method 80 cases of colon cancer patients were randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group,40 cases in each group. The control group were treated with traditional open surgery,the experimental group were treated with laparoscopic radical surgery. Therapeutic effects were observed to evaluate postoperative recovery,follow-up observation of the quality of life of patients. Results The experimental group blood loss was less than the control group ( P<0. 05);After surgery,the experimental group flatus,temperature recovery,get out of bed and eating time were shorter than the control group(P<0. 05);the experimental group quality of life were better than the control group(P<0. 05). Conclusion For colon canc-er patients,laparoscopic radical surgery can effectively circumvent the shortcomings of traditional open surgery,patients with a shorter hospital stay,postoperative easy recovery,quality of life improved significantly.%目的：对比腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗结肠癌的临床效果。方法：选取80例结肠癌患者随机分为两组，每组40例。对照组行传统开腹手术，试验组实施腹腔镜根治术，观察两组治疗效果，评估术后恢复情况，随访观察患者生活质量。结果：试验组术中出血量明显少于对照组（P＜0.05）；试验组术后肛门排气、体温恢复、下床活动及进食时间明显短于对照组（P＜0.05）；试验组生活质量明显优于对照组（ P＜0.05）。结论：对于结肠癌患者而言，腹腔镜根治术可有效规避传统开腹手术的缺陷，患者住院时间较短，术后易于恢复，生活质量也得到显著改善。
展开▼
