Trima与Amicus两种血细胞分离机的性能比较

摘要

Objective To contrastively analyze the performance of two kinds of blood cell separators for apheresis platelets . Methods 80 blood donors were selected from 4 234 healthy apheresis platelet donors and their data before and after apheresis platelets were respectively collected by using two kinds of different blood cell separators Trima and Amicus .The product quality during the collection process ,residual WBC and RBC count ,acquisition time ,collection efficiency ,scrapping situation and safety were performed the comparative analysis between the two kinds of blood cell separator .Results In the case of the difference of the basic parameters before apheresis platelet having no statistical significance ,the two kinds of blood cell separator had no differences in the aspects of product quality ,processing blood amount and the use amount of anticoagulants(P>0 .05);but there were statisti‐cal differences in the aspects of acquisition time ,collection efficiency and pipeline residual blood amount (P<0 .05) .Conclusion Two kinds of blood cell separators have their own advantages and disadvantages during the use process ,so the blood cell separator should be selected according to the physical quality and their own characteristics of blood donors .%目的：对比分析两种血细胞分离机单采血小板的性能。方法从健康机采血小板献血员4234名中，选取80名献血员前后使用两种不同血细胞分离机T rima和Amicus采集数据，比较分析两种不同的血细胞分离机采集过程中的产品质量、残余白细胞和红细胞计数、采集时间、采集效率、报废情况及安全性等方面。结果在两种血细胞分离机的献血员采集前基本参数差异无统计学意义的情况下，两种血细胞分离机采集的产品质量方面、处理血量和抗凝剂使用量方面差异无统计学意义（P＞0．05）；但是两种血细胞分离机在采集时间、采集效率和管道残余血量方面进行比较时，差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05）。结论两种类型的血细胞分离机在使用过程中各有利弊，因此应该根据献血员的身体素质与自身特点选择相应的血细胞分离机。