"要么化肥好,要么化肥不好"的争论不休,破解"二元无解"的争论很有必要.化肥本身没有问题(排除生产降耗等因素),怎么使用需要科学.新时期将"化肥"定义为"养分材料"比较好.化肥之于土,无土不存.土壤之于肥,无养不生.化肥是植物养分外供最大的"给养库";腐植酸是土壤最大的"储碳库",还是判断土壤肥力的"金标准".如今,"让腐植酸从土壤中来到土壤中去",是我们主观作为的着力处.确立"有机-无机营养供给理论"和"腐植酸有机-无机营养供给理论"的"两机理论",有利于正确指导中国农业和世界农业可持续发展.发展气候智慧型农业,通过黑色腐植酸、腐植酸低碳肥料大量投放,让"两机"再造,功在当代、利在千秋.%It is necessary to solve the debate of "either chemical fertilizer is good or chemical fertilizer is not good". Chemical fertilizer itself is no problem (excluding factors such as production and consumption reduction), but how to use chemical fertilizer need science. It is defined as a "nutrient material" much better. Chemical fertilizer, soil and nutrients are closely related. Chemical fertilizer is the largest "supply depot" for plant nutrients, and humic acid is the largest "carbon storage" of soil and the "gold standard" of soil fertility. Now, "let humic acid come into the soil, who comes from the soil" is the focus of our subjective action. Establishing the "organic-inorganic" theories of "organic-inorganic nutrition supply theory" and "humic acid-organic-inorganic nutrition supply theory" are conducive to guiding the sustainable development in China and the world. Developing the climate agriculture, using humic acid and humic acid fertilizer extensively under the guidance of the "organic-inorganic" theories, will benefit both current and future generations.
展开▼
