This paper mainly draws on Fairclough’s three-dimensional framework of critical discourse analysis. The comparicon between the speech reporing in China Daily and The Guardian on the reporting of China’s role in Copenhagen climate deal. Trying to find out the ideology of reporters concealed in news discourses and to verify the basic idea of critical discourses analysis.% 本文采用 Fairslough 提出的批评性语篇分析框架,从转述方式、消息来源和转述动词三个方面对比《中国日报》和《路透社》在报道2012年东盟外长会议未发公报这一事件时所用的转述引语,试图从批评语言学的角度揭示报道者隐藏于转述引语背后的立场、观点和态度,从而考察语言与意识形态二者之间的依存关系。
展开▼