首页> 中文期刊>世界胃肠内镜杂志:英文版(电子版) >Efficacy of various endoscopic modalities in detecting dysplasia in ulcerative colitis:A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Efficacy of various endoscopic modalities in detecting dysplasia in ulcerative colitis:A systematic review and network meta-analysis

     

摘要

BACKGROUND Longstanding ulcerative colitis(UC)is associated with an increased risk of colonic neoplasia.Various endoscopic modalities,such as chromoendoscopy(CE),narrow band imaging(NBI)and random biopsy have been introduced for surveillance,however,there exists a paucity of direct comparisons between them.We aimed to conduct a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(RCTs)performed for surveillance of neoplasia in UC.AIM To provide a comparative evaluation of the efficacy of the above-mentioned various modalities.METHODS We searched MEDLINE/PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,Google Scholar and Cochrane Central Registry through May 2016 for RCTs evaluating the efficacy of endoscopic modalities for surveillance of neoplasia in UC.The primary outcomes of interest were dysplasia(low-or high-grade)detection rates per biopsy and per patient,and dysplasia numbers per patient.Studies were simultaneously analyzed using a random-effects network meta-analysis under the Bayesian framework to identify the modality with the highest dysplasia detection rate.The best ranking probability for the dysplasia detection rate was analyzed by surface under the cumulative ranking(SUCRA)technique.RESULTS Six prospective RCTs of a total 1038 patients were identified.We identified 4 different modalities;white light(WL)high definition(HD)or standard definition(SD),CE HD,and NBI HD.For dysplasia per biopsy,direct meta-analysis showed superiority of NBI HD over WL HD and CE HD over WL SD.Network meta-analysis demonstrated the rank order of best modality as NBI HD,CE HD,WL HD and WL SD with close SUCRA scores of the first two.For dysplasia per patient,direct meta-analyses showed equivocal results between each modality.Network meta-analysis demonstrated the rank order of best modality as WL HD,NBI HD,CE HD and WL SD with small differences of the SUCRA score among the first two.For dysplasia numbers per patient,direct meta-analysis showed superiority of CE HD over WL SD.Network meta-analysis demonstrated the rank order of best modality as WL HD,NBI HD,CE HD,and WL SD with small differences of the SUCRA score among the first three.CONCLUSION We demonstrated that there were small differences among WL HD,NBI HD,and CE HD,while WL SD was inferior,in detecting dysplasia in UC.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号