Objective To compare the ettects of two kinds of abduction pillow used in postoperative artificial total hip arthro-plasty(THA). Methods 160 cases of artificial THA in our hospital from January 2007 to October 2010 were divided into two groups,80 cases in each group. The experimental group used the introduced new technological ladder-shaped abduction pillow,and the control group was given the improved abduction pillow. The effects of two kinds of abduction pillow used in postoperative artificial total hip replacement were compared. Results In experimental group, the position turning over took 5 - 10 min,the tolerance time of lateral lying position was (10. 0+1. 3)min. The comfort level and the satisfaction level were 31. 2% and 65. 0%. But in the control group,the position turning over took 3 - 5 min,the tolerance time of lateral lying position was (30. 0±2. L)min. The comfort level and the satisfaction level were 56. 2% and 90. 0%. The results showed statistical difference between the two groups(P< 0. 05). Conclusion The improved abduction pillow is better than introduced new technological ladder-like abduction pillow.%目的 比较两种外展枕用于人工全髋关节置换术(THA)后的效果.方法 选择2007年1月至2010年10月行THA的患者160例随机分为实验组和对照组,每组80例,实验组使用引进的新技术梯形外展枕,对照组为改良后的外展枕.比较两组外展枕用于THA后的效果.结果 实验组患者翻身时间(5～10)min、侧卧耐受时间(10.0±1.3)min,舒适度(31.2%)和满意度(65.0%),与对照组[分别为(3～5)、(30.0±2.1)min、56.2%和90.0%]比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 改良后的外展枕更利于THA后的患者.
展开▼
