首页> 外文期刊>中华医学杂志(英文版) >Computer-assisted navigation systems for insertion of cannulated screws in femoral neck fractures: a comparison of bi-planar robot navigation with optoelectronic navigation in a Synbone hip model trial
【24h】

Computer-assisted navigation systems for insertion of cannulated screws in femoral neck fractures: a comparison of bi-planar robot navigation with optoelectronic navigation in a Synbone hip model trial

机译:用于在股骨颈骨折中插入空心螺钉的计算机辅助导航系统:在Synbone髋关节模型试验中双平面机器人导航与光电导航的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Computer-assisted procedures have recently been introduced for navigated femoral neck screw placement.Currently there is little information available regarding accuracy and efficiency of the different navigated procedures.The aim of this study was to compare two fluoroscopic navigation tracking technologies,a novel bi-planar robot navigation and standardized optoelectronic navigation,versus standard freehand fluoroscopic insertion in a Synbone hip model.Methods Eighteen fixed Synbone hip models were divided into 3 groups.C-arm navigated cannulated screws (AO-ASIF,diameter 7.3 mm) were inserted using freehand targeting (control group).A novel bi-planar robot system (TINAV,GD2000) and an optoelectronic system (Stryker OTS Navigation System) were used for the navigated procedures (robot group and optoelectronic group).Accuracy was measured using radiographic evaluation including the measurement of screw parallelism and decentralization,and joint penetration.To evaluate the efficiency,the number of guidewire passes,operative time and fluoroscopic images taken were noted.Results The two computer-assisted systems provided significantly improved accuracy compared to the freehand technique.Each of the parameters,including guidewire passes and number of fluoroscopy images,was significantly lower when using the computer-assisted systems than for freehand-unguided insertion (P <0.05),but operative time was significantly shorter when using freehand-unguided insertion than for the computer-assisted systems (P <0.05).Accuracy,operative time and number of fluoroscopy images taken were similar among the two navigated groups (P >0.05),but guidewire passes in the robot group were significantly less than in the optoelectronic group (P <0.05).Conclusions Both bi-planar robot navigation and optoelectronic navigation were similarly accurate and have the potential to improve accuracy and reduce radiation for freehand fluoroscopic targeting for insertion of cannulated screws in femoral neck fractures.Guidewire passes in the robot group were significantly less than in the optoelectronic group.However,both navigated procedures were associated with time-consuming registration and high rates of failed matching procedures.
机译:背景技术最近,已引入了计算机辅助程序以进行导航性股骨颈螺钉放置。目前,关于不同导航程序的准确性和效率的信息很少。本研究的目的是比较两种荧光镜导航跟踪技术,一种新颖的双向导航技术。方法将平面机器人导航和标准化光电导航与标准徒手荧光透视法插入到Synbone髋关节模型中。方法将18个固定的Synbone髋关节模型分为3组,使用徒手插入C臂导航空心螺钉(AO-ASIF,直径7.3 mm)瞄准(对照组):将新型双平面机器人系统(TINAV,GD2000)和光电系统(Stryker OTS导航系统)用于导航程序(机器人组和光电组),并使用射线照相评估来评估准确性,包括测量螺钉的平行度和分散性以及接头的穿透性。结果记录了这两种计算机辅助系统,与徒手技术相比,准确性得到了显着提高。包括导丝通过和荧光检查图像数量在内的每个参数均得到了显着提高。使用计算机辅助系统的时间要比徒手引导插入的时间要短(P <0.05),但是使用计算机辅助系统的时间要比计算机辅助系统的要短得多(P <0.05)。两个导航组的透视图像数量相似(P> 0.05),但机器人组的导丝通过率明显低于光电组(P <0.05)。结论双平面机器人导航和光电导航均类似的精确度,并有可能提高准确性并减少辐射,以进行徒手的透视检查以插入空心螺钉股骨颈骨折。机器人组的导丝通过率明显低于光电组。但是,这两种导航程序都与费时的配准和高失败率的匹配程序相关。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中华医学杂志(英文版)》 |2011年第23期|3906-3911|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China;

    Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China;

    Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China;

    Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China;

    Robotics Institute, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;

    Robotics Institute, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;

    Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China;

    Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 chi
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号