首页> 外文期刊>中华医学杂志(英文版) >A multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study to evaluate the effects of two different doses of losartan on morbidity and mortality in Chinese patients with symptomatic heart failure intolerant of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor t
【24h】

A multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study to evaluate the effects of two different doses of losartan on morbidity and mortality in Chinese patients with symptomatic heart failure intolerant of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor t

机译:一项多中心,双盲,随机平行分组研究,评估了两种不同剂量的氯沙坦对中国有症状心衰耐受性血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂t%A的患者的发病率和死亡率的影响。盲,随机,平行分组研究评估两种不同剂量的氯沙坦对中国有症状心衰耐受性血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗的患者的发病率和死亡率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background There have been no mortality/morbidity endpoint studies with losartan in Chinese heart failure patients.The objective was to evaluate the effects of high-dose vs.low-dose losartan on clinical outcomes in Chinese subjects with heart failure.Methods This study was a post hoc analysis of the Heart failure Endpoint evaluation of Angiotensin Ⅱ Antagonist losartan (HEAAL)trial (n=545).Chinese adults with symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Ⅱ-Ⅳ)intolerant of treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were randomized to losartan 150 mg or 50 mg daily.The primary endpoint was the composite event rate of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure.Safety and tolerability were assessed.Results Median follow-up was 4.8 years.Baseline characteristics were generally similar to the overall HEAAL cohort.Overall,120 (44.1%) subjects in the losartan 150 mg group and 137 (50.2%) subjects in the losartan 50 mg group died (any cause) or were hospitalized for heart failure (hazard ratio (OR) 0.807,95% CI0.631-1.031).There were no notable differences between treatment groups in the proportion of subjects with adverse experiences.Conclusion The results of this post hoc analysis in Chinese subjects,although not powered to show significance,were generally consistent with the main study results,which demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of all cause death or hospitalization for heart failure with daily losartan 150 mg vs.losartan 50 mg in subjects with symptomatic heart failure and intolerance to ACE inhibitors,supporting the use of the higher dose for optimum clinical benefit.
机译:背景尚无在中国心力衰竭患者中使用氯沙坦治疗的死亡率/发病率终点研究,目的是评估高剂量氯沙坦与低剂量氯沙坦对中国心衰患者临床结局的影响。心力衰竭的事后分析血管紧张素Ⅱ拮抗剂洛沙坦(HEAAL)试验的终点评估(n = 545)。中国有症状心力衰竭的成年人(纽约心脏协会(NYHA)Ⅱ-Ⅳ)对血管紧张素转换酶( ACE)抑制剂被随机分配到氯沙坦每天150 mg或50 mg,主要终点是心力衰竭全因死亡或住院的复合事件发生率,评估安全性和耐受性,结果中位随访时间为4.8年。基线特征总体上与总体HEAAL相似。氯沙坦150 mg组的总体120例(44.1%)受试者和氯沙坦50 mg组的137例(50.2%)死亡(任何原因)或因心力衰竭而用唾液酸化治疗(危险比(OR)0.807,95%CI0.631-1.031)。治疗组之间有不良经历的受试者的比例没有显着差异。结论在中国受试者中进行事后分析的结果是,尽管没有证据显示其重要性,但总体上与主要研究结果一致,这表明有症状性心力衰竭和不耐受的受试者每天服用氯沙坦150 mg vs.氯沙坦50 mg显着降低了因心力衰竭导致的所有死亡或住院风险。 ACE抑制剂,支持使用更高剂量以获得最佳临床效果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中华医学杂志(英文版)》 |2012年第21期|3868-3874|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Cardiology, Peking University People's Hospital,Beijing 100044, China;

    Department of Cardiology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing,Jiangsu 210029, China;

    Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University,Shanghai 200032, China;

    Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China;

    Clinical Pharmacology Center, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing 100037,China;

    Department of Biostatistics, MSD(Europe)Inc., Brussels,Belgium;

    Global Scientific and Medical Publications, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA;

    Department of Cardiology, University of Bergen, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 chi
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号