首页> 外文期刊>中华医学杂志(英文版) >Biomechanical comparison of interspinous distraction device and facet screw fixation system on the motion of lumbar spine: a finite element analysis
【24h】

Biomechanical comparison of interspinous distraction device and facet screw fixation system on the motion of lumbar spine: a finite element analysis

机译:棘突间牵引装置和小平面螺钉固定系统对腰椎运动的生物力学比较:有限元分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background A large amount of biomechanical and clinical evidence from previous studies suggest the efficiency of the two different posterior lumber non-fusion methods,interspinous distraction device (ISDD) and facet screw fixation system (FSS),but the biomechanical comparison of ISDD and FSS has not been thoroughly clarified.Methods In the current study,finite element methods were used to investigate the biomechanical comparison of ISDD and FSS.The range of motion (ROM),intradiscal pressure (IDP) and the protective effects gained by maintaining disc heights were evaluated.Results The ROM was similar between the two non-fusion methods under static standing,flexion and lateral bending.The FSS appeared to be more effective in resisting extension.At the implanted level L3/4,FSS displayed better results for maintaining and increasing posterior disc heights.At the L4/5 level in extension and lateral bending,FSS was better than ISDD,with comparable results observed in other motions.Comparing the posterior and lateral disc heights,FSS appeared to be more effective than ISDD.FSS also had a minor effect on the inferior adjacent segment than ISDD.FSS was more effective in reducing IDP than ISDD in extension.Conclusion Through the finite element analysis study,it can be seen that FSS demonstrates more beneficial biomechanical outcomes than does ISDD,such as being more effective in resisting extension,maintaining and increasing lumbar disc heights and reducing the inferior adjacent IDP in extension.
机译:背景先前研究的大量生物力学和临床证据表明,两种不同的后木材非融合方法,棘突间牵引装置(ISDD)和小平面螺钉固定系统(FSS)的有效性,但ISDD和FSS的生物力学比较具有方法在本研究中,有限元方法被用来研究ISDD和FSS的生物力学比较。评估了运动范围(ROM),颈内压(IDP)以及通过保持椎间盘高度而获得的保护作用。结果在静坐,屈曲和侧向弯曲两种非融合方法中,ROM相似.FSS似乎在抵抗伸展方面更有效。在植入水平L3 / 4时,FSS表现出更好的保持和增加后部效果椎间盘高度。在L4 / 5伸展和横向弯曲水平上,FSS优于ISDD,在其他运动中观察到可比的结果。在前后椎间盘高度方面,FSS似乎比ISDD更有效。FSS对下相邻节段的影响也比ISDD小。FSS在减少IDP方面比ISDD更为有效。结论通过有限元分析研究,可以看出,与ISDD相比,FSS表现出更有益的生物力学结果,例如在抵抗伸展,保持和增加腰椎间盘高度以及减少伸展中下相邻IDP方面更有效。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中华医学杂志(英文版)》 |2014年第11期|2078-2084|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area Command of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shenyang,Liaoning 110016, China;

    Naton Institute of Medical Technology and Beijing Medical Implant Engineering Research Center, Beijing 100094, China;

    Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National YangMing University, Taibei 112, Taiwan, China;

    Naton Institute of Medical Technology and Beijing Medical Implant Engineering Research Center, Beijing 100094, China;

    Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area Command of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shenyang,Liaoning 110016, China;

    Department of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China;

    School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号