首页> 外文期刊>中华医学杂志(英文版) >Safety and efficacy of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

机译:毕马前列素/替莫洛尔固定组合在中国开角型青光眼或高眼压患者中的安全性和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Lowering intraocular pressure (lOP) is currently the only therapeutic approach in primary open-angle glaucoma.and the fixed-combination medications are needed to achieve sufficiently low target lOP.A multicenter prospective study in the Chinese population was needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Eye Drop in China.In this study,we evaluated the safety and efficacy of Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination with concurrent administration of its components in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.Methods In this multicenter,randomized,double-masked,parallel controlled study,patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were insufficiently responsive to monotherapy with either topical β-blockers or prostaglandin analogues were randomized to one of two active treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio at 11 Chinese ophthalmic departments.Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination treatment was a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (followed by vehicle for masking) once daily at 19:00 P.M.and concurrent treatment was 0.03% bimatoprost followed by 0.5% timolol once daily at 19:00 P.M.The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) at week 4 visit in the intent-to-treat (ITr) population.Primary analysis evaluated the non-inferiority of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination to concurrent with respect to the primary variable using a confidence interval (CI) approach.Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination was to be considered non-inferior to concurrent if the upper limit of the 95% CI for the between-treatment (bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination minus concurrent) difference was-≤1.5 mmHg.Adverse events were collected and slit-lamp examinations were performed to assess safety.Between-group comparisons of the incidence of adverse events were performed using the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.Results Of the enrolled 235 patients,121 patients were randomized to receive bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination and,114 patients were randomized to receive concurrent treatment.At baseline the mean value of mean diurnal IOP was (25.20±3.06) mmHg in the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination group and (24.87±3.88) mmHg in the concurrent group.The difference between the treatment groups was not statistically significant.The mean change from baseline in mean diurnal IOP (±standard deviation) in the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination group was (-9.38±4.66) mmHg and it was (-8.93±4.25) mmHg in the concurrent group (P <0.01).The difference between the two treatment groups (bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination minus concurrent) in the change from baseline of mean diurnal IOP was-0.556 mmHg (95% CI:-1.68,0.57,P=0.330).The upper limit of the 95% CI was less than 1.5 mmHg,the predefined margin of non-inferiority.Adverse events occurred in 26.4% (32/121)of the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination patients and 30.7% (35/114) of the concurrent patients.The most frequent adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia,which was reported as treatment related in 16.5% (20/121) in the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination group and 18.4%(21/114) in the concurrent group (P >0.05).Conclusions Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination administered in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension was not inferior to concurrent dosing with the individual components.Safety profiles were similar between the treatment groups.
机译:背景技术降低眼内压(lOP)是目前在原发性开角型青光眼中唯一的治疗方法,并且需要使用固定组合药物来达到足够低的lOP目标。在中国人群中需要进行多中心前瞻性研究以确认其安全性和有效性。在本研究中,我们评估了比马前列素/替莫洛尔固定联合滴眼液在中国开角型青光眼或高眼压患者中的安全性和有效性。 ,随机,双掩蔽,平行对照研究,对局部β-受体阻滞剂或前列腺素类似物的单药治疗反应不佳的开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者按1:1的比例随机分为两个有效治疗组之一在11个中国眼科医院接受比马前列素/噻吗洛尔固定联合治疗每天19:00 PM服用0.03%的比马前列素和0.5%噻吗洛尔(随后用掩膜剂),同时治疗为0.03%的比马前列素,然后是0.5%噻吗洛尔,每天19:00 PM一次主要疗效变量与基线相比有所变化意向性治疗(ITr)人群在第4周就诊时的平均昼夜眼压(IOP)。主要分析通过置信区间()评估了比马前列素/替莫洛尔固定组合与主要变量并发的非劣效性(如果两次治疗之间的95%CI的上限(比马前列素/噻吗洛尔固定组合减去并发)之差的上限为-≤1.5mmHg,则认为比马前列素/替莫洛尔固定组合不逊于并发。收集并进行裂隙灯检查以评估安全性。使用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行不良事件发生率的组间比较。 ed 235例患者,随机分配121例患者接受比马前列素/替莫洛尔固定联合治疗,并随机分组114例患者同时接受比马前列酮/替莫洛尔固定联合治疗,平均每日IOP值为(25.20±3.06)mmHg并发组(24.87±3.88)mmHg。治疗组之间的差异无统计学意义。比马前列素/替莫洛尔固定联合治疗组平均每日眼压(±标准偏差)相对于基线的平均变化为(-9.38±并发组为(4.69)mmHg(-8.93±4.25)mmHg(P <0.01)。两个治疗组(比马前列素/替莫洛尔固定联合减并发)的平均每日眼压基线变化为- 0.556 mmHg(95%CI:-1.68,0.57,P = 0.330)。95%CI的上限小于1.5 mmHg,预定义的非劣势范围。不良事件发生率为26.4%(32/121)比马前列素/噻吗洛尔固定组合患者并发患者中30.7%(35/114)。最常见的不良事件是结膜充血,据报道比马前列素/替莫洛尔固定联合治疗组的治疗占16.5%(20/121),18.4%(21/114)与治疗有关。 )(P> 0.05)。结论在中国开角型青光眼或高眼压患者中,比马前列素/替莫洛固定联合给药的效果不逊于各成分的同时给药,治疗组之间的安全性相似。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中华医学杂志(英文版)》 |2014年第5期|905-910|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China;

    Department of Ophthalmology, Wuhan Union Hospital, Wuhan,Hubei 430022, China;

    Department of Ophthalmology, Wuhan Union Hospital, Wuhan,Hubei 430022, China;

    Department of Ophthalmology, Southwest Hospital, Chongqing 400038, China;

    Department of Ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China;

    Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China;

    Department of Ophthalmology, Daping Hospital of Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号