首页> 外文期刊>中华医学杂志(英文版) >Ceramic on Ceramic or Ceramic-on-polyethylene for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Studies
【24h】

Ceramic on Ceramic or Ceramic-on-polyethylene for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Studies

机译:用于全髋关节置换术的陶瓷上陶瓷或聚乙烯上陶瓷:前瞻性随机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background:Wear debris of polyethylene has become a restraining factor of the durability for total hip arthroplasty (THA).Ceramic on ceramic (COC) has better wear resistance while the squeaking sound and prosthesis fracture are of concern.It is still a controversy that bearing couples are better for THA.Methods:We performed a systematic review of all English articles identified from PubMed (1966-),Embase (1980-) and the Cochrane Library.Clinical outcomes,complications,revision rates,and radiographic outcomes of COC-THA and ceramic on polyethylene (COP)-THA were compared and evaluated.Results:Eight prospective randomized trials enrolling a total of 1508 patients and 1702 THA surgeries were identified.Our results demonstrated the prosthesis fracture and the squeaking sound is significantly higher in COC group and higher wear rate of the COP.Hip function,loosening rate,dislocation rate,revision rate,and the osteolysis rate were comparable between two groups.According to Grading of Recommendations Assessment,Development and Evaluation system assessment,the strength of evidence was high for prosthesis fracture,dislocation,osteolysis,and moderate for radiolucent line or loosening,hip noise,and revision.Conclusions:Up to now,there is insufficient evidence to identify any clinical advantage of COC compared with COP.Longer follow-up of larger randomized trial is needed to clarify the outcomes.
机译:背景:聚乙烯的磨损碎片已成为全髋关节置换术(THA)耐用性的制约因素。陶瓷对陶瓷(COC)的耐磨性更好,而吱吱声和假体断裂是值得关注的问题。方法:我们对从PubMed(1966-),Embase(1980-)和Cochrane图书馆发现的所有英语文章进行了系统的综述。COC-THA的临床结局,并发症,修订率和影像学结果结果:八项前瞻性随机试验共纳入1508例患者和1702例THA手术,我们的结果表明,在COC组中,假体骨折和吱吱声明显高于对照组。 COP的磨损率较高。两组的髋关节功能,松动率,脱位率,翻修率和溶骨率相当。评估,开发和评估系统评估,假体骨折,脱位,溶骨的证据强度高,而放射线透明或松动,髋部噪声和翻修的证据强度中等。结论:到目前为止,没有足够的证据来识别任何假体与COP相比,COC具有更大的临床优势。需要对更大的随机试验进行更长时间的随访,以阐明结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中华医学杂志(英文版)》 |2015年第9期|1223-1231|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 03:58:57
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号