首页> 外文期刊>中华医学杂志(英文版) >Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ⅲ Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study
【24h】

Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ⅲ Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study

机译:Ⅲ型重症患者血糖控制和常规血糖管理方案对血糖控制的比较:一项前瞻性,随机临床研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background:The Space Glucose Control (SGC) system is a computer-assisted device combining infusion pumps with the enhanced Model Predictive Control algorithm to achieve the target blood glucose (BG) level safely.The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glycemic control by SGC with customized BG target range of 5.8-8.9 mmol/L in the critically ill patients.Methods:It is a randomized controlled trial of seventy critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation and hyperglycemia (BG > 9.0 mmol/L).Thirty-six patients in the SGC group and 34 in the routine glucose management group were observed for three consecutive days.Target BG for both groups was 5.8-8.9 mmol/L.The primary outcome was the percentage time in the target range.Results:The percentage time within BG target range in the SGC group (69 ± 15%) was significantly higher than in the routine management group (52 ± 24%;P < 0.01).No measurement was <2.2 mmol/L,and there was only one episode of hypoglycemia (2.3-3.3 mmol/L) in each group.The average BG was significantly lower in the SGC group (7.8 ± 0.7 mmol/L) than in the routine management group (9.1 ± 1.6 mmol/L,P < 0.001).Target BG level was reached earlier in the SGC group than routine management group (2.5 ± 2.9 vs.12.1 ± 15.3 h,P =0.001).However,the SGC group performed worse for daily insulin requirement (59.8 ± 39.3 vs.28.4 ± 36.7 U,P =0.001)and sampling interval (2.0 ± 0.5 vs.3.7 ± 0.5 h,P < 0.001) than the routine management group did.Multiple linear regression showed that the intervention group remained a significant individual predictor (P < 0.001) of the percentage time in target range.Conclusions:The SGC system,with a BG target of 5.8-8.9 mmol/L,resulted in effective and reliable glycemic control with few hypoglycemic episodes in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation and hyperglycemia.However,the workload was increased.Trial Registration:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov,NCT 02491346;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02491346?term=NCT0 2491346&cond=Hyperglycemia&cntry1=ES%3ACN&rank=1.
机译:背景:太空葡萄糖控制(SGC)系统是一种计算机辅助设备,将输液泵与增强的模型预测控制算法相结合,可以安全地达到目标血糖(BG)水平。本研究的目的是评估疗效和安全性方法:这是一项针对70例机械通气和高血糖(BG> 9.0 mmol / L)的重症患者的随机对照试验,其定制的BG目标范围为5.8-8.9 mmol / L。连续三天观察SGC组的36例患者和常规血糖管理组的34例患者,两组的目标BG为5.8-8.9 mmol / L,主要结果是在目标范围内的时间百分比。 SGC组在BG目标范围内的百分比时间(69±15%)显着高于常规管理组(52±24%; P <0.01)。没有测量值<2.2 mmol / L,只有一降糖两组的平均BG(2.3-3.3 mmol / L)。SGC组的平均BG(7.8±0.7 mmol / L)显着低于常规管理组(9.1±1.6 mmol / L,P <0.001)。 SGC组比常规管理组更早达到目标BG水平(2.5±2.9 vs. 12.1±15.3 h,P = 0.001)。但是,SGC组的每日胰岛素需求较差(59.8±39.3 vs. 28.4±36.7) U,P = 0.001)和抽样间隔(2.0±0.5 vs.3.7±0.5 h,P <0.001)优于常规管理组。多元线性回归表明干预组仍是干预组的重要个体预测指标(P <0.001)。结论:SGC系统的目标血糖为5.8-8.9 mmol / L,可对机械通气和高血糖的重症患者进行有效,可靠的血糖控制,降血糖事件很少。试用注册:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov,NCT 02491346; https://www.clinicaltrials。 gov / ct2 / show / NCT02491346?term = NCT0 2491346&cond = Hyperglycemia&cntry1 = ES%3ACN&rank = 1。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中华医学杂志(英文版)》 |2017年第17期|2041-2049|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;

    Critical Care Center, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing 100039, China;

    Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;

    Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;

    Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;

    Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;

    Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;

    Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号