用蛛网图法评估中国科学引文数据库收录的儿科类期刊质量

摘要

目的：评估中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）收录的7种儿科类期刊质量。方法：通过“中国科技期刊引证指标数据库”获得7种儿科类期刊2013年的篇均参考文献、被引半衰期、H 指数、引用半衰期、自引率、影响因子、即年指数、自被引率等数据，并将指标按其与期刊质量的正、负相关关系分为两组，分别绘制蛛网图，然后结合7种儿科类期刊的发文情况进行质量评估。结果：以篇均参考文献、影响因子、H 指数、即年指数为一组进行蛛网图法评估，排在前3位的期刊是《中华儿科杂志》《中华实用儿科临床杂志》、《中国循证儿科杂志》；以引用半衰期、自引率、被引半衰期、自被引率为一组进行蛛网图法评估，排在前3位的期刊是《中国循证儿科杂志》、《中华儿科杂志》、《临床儿科杂志》。结论：7种儿科类期刊整体质量较高，《中国循证儿科杂志》、《中华儿科杂志》综合评价最好，其他各刊还有提升空间。%Objective To assess the CSCD-covered 7 journals of pediactrics.Methods The average number of refe rences,cited half life, H index, citation half life, self citation, IF, immediate index, self-cited rate of each paper pub-lished in 2013 in 7 journals of pediactric, covered in China Science and Technology Journal Citation Index Database, were divided into positive correlation group and negative correlation group.Their Spider Web maps were plotted.The papers published in the 7 journals of pediactrics were assessed.Results The top 3 journals, assessed according to the average number of references, IF, and immediate index, were Chinese Journal of Pediatrics,Chinese Journal of Prac-tical Pediatrics, and Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Pediatrics while the top 3 journals, assessed according to their citation half life , self citation, cited half life, and self cited rate, were Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Pe-diatrics,Chinese Journal of Pediatrics, and Journal of Clinical Pediatrics.Conclusion The academic level of the 7 journals of pediatrics is rather high.Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Pediatrics and Chinese Journal of Pediatrics have the highest assessment score.There is a large room for the other 4 journals to improve their academic level.