首页> 中文期刊> 《中国感染控制杂志》 >不同皮肤消毒剂对中心静脉导管相关血流感染发病率的影响

不同皮肤消毒剂对中心静脉导管相关血流感染发病率的影响

             

摘要

目的:研究不同皮肤消毒剂对预防导管相关性血流感染(CRBSI)的影响。方法采用临床对照研究,比较2011年12月—2014年5月某三级甲等医院综合重症监护病房(ICU)患者中心静脉置管前使用复合型皮肤消毒剂、2%葡萄糖酸氯己定醇皮肤消毒剂患者 CRBSI 发病率差异。结果使用2%葡萄糖酸氯己定醇皮肤消毒剂的患者发生 CRBSI 2例,其中革兰阴性菌(铜绿假单胞菌)和革兰阳性菌感染(金黄色葡萄球菌)各1例,CRBSI发病率为0.44‰(2/4546);使用复合型皮肤消毒剂的患者发生 CRBSI 22例,其中13例革兰阴性菌感染,7例革兰阳性菌感染,2例真菌感染,CRBSI 发病率4.11‰(22/5349),两组 CRBSI 发病率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=15.640,P <0.01)。结论中心静脉置管前使用2%葡萄糖酸氯己定醇的皮肤消毒效果更好,可以有效地降低ICU 患者 CRBSI 发病率,值得临床优先应用。%Objective To study the effect of different skin disinfectant on the prevention of catheter-related blood-stream infection (CRBSI).Methods Clinical control study was used to compare the difference in incidences of CRB-SI in patients who used compound skin disinfectant and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)alcohol skin disinfectant before central venous catheterization in the intensive care unit of a tertiary first class hospital between December 2011 and May 2014.Results Among patients who used 2% CHG alcohol skin disinfectant,2 had CRBSI,one was gram-negative bacterial infection (Pseudomonas aeruginosa ),and the other was gram-positive bacterial infection (Staphylococcus aureus ),incidence of CRBSI was 0.44‰(2/4 546);among patients who used compound skin disin-fectant,22 had CRBSI,13 were gram-negative bacterial infection,7 were gram-positive bacterial infection,and 2 were fungal infection,incidence of CRBSI was 4.11 ‰(22/5 349),incidence of CRBSI between two groups of pa-tients was significantly different (χ2 =15.640,P <0.01).Conclusion 2% CHG alcohol skin disinfectant has a bet-ter effect on the skin disinfection before central venous catheterization,which can effectively reduce the incidence of CRBSI in ICU patients,and is worthy of priority clinical application.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号