目的：对已建立的癌痛规范化诊疗评估体系进行初步临床应用，探索癌痛诊疗工作的不足之处。方法：分析从徐州市中心医院等三家医院肿瘤科采集的41份医生问卷、43份护士问卷、50份患者问卷和12份科室问卷，找出临床癌痛诊疗工作的主要不足；对此三家医院肿瘤专科和与肿瘤相关的非肿瘤专科进行评估，采用秩和检验分析两者关于癌痛诊疗工作的差异。结果：医生、护士、科室的平均评分分别为85.41±5.93、88.46±5.09、83.75±3.11分，而患者平均评分仅68.67±7.14分；其中患者止痛有效性与安全性评分换算为百分制后为81.69±7.71分，但关于止痛观念改变的评分换算后仅为55.78±11.37分。肿瘤专科平均得分82.22±2.03分，非肿瘤专科平均得分39.27±3.58分，经秩和检验Wilcoxon W值为120.0，P<0.01。结论：患者止痛治疗的观念教育仍需进一步加强；与肿瘤相关的非肿瘤专科在癌痛诊疗方面有较大欠缺，迫切需要进一步加强继续教育。%Objective:To make a preliminary application of the assessment system for cancer pain management and find insuffi-ciency in the clinical practice of cancer pain diagnosis and treatment. Methods:Data from 41 doctor questionnaires, 43 nurse question-naires, 50 patient questionnaires, and 12 ward questionnaires from the tumor departments of 3 hospitals were analyzed, and the insuffi-ciency in cancer pain management was determined. The wards in the tumor and non-tumor departments related to oncology were as-sessed using rank test, and differences between the 2 wards were investigated. Results:The average scores of doctor, nurse, and wards were 85.41±5.93, 88.46±5.09 and 83.75±3.11, respectively, whereas patient score was 68.67±7.14. To further analyze the patient subsys-tem by converting into a hundred-mark system, the effectiveness and safety scores for the pain management was 81.69±7.71. However, patients' opinion score on pain treatment was only 55.78±11.37. The score of tumor departments was 82.22±2.03, whereas related non-tumor departments had a score of 39.27 ± 3.58. Wilcoxon W value was at 120.0 with P<0.01 after rank test. Conclusion:Education on patients' opinion on cancer pain management should be promoted in the tumor wards, and continuous education on cancer pain diagno-sis and treatment is needed in the non-tumor departments relative to oncology.
展开▼
