首页> 中文期刊>中国美容医学 >三种方式治疗增生性瘢痕的疗效分析

三种方式治疗增生性瘢痕的疗效分析

     

摘要

Objective To evaluate theCompare three methods of treatment (triamcinolone acetonide acetate injection, beauty skin care to stick ,32P patches) clinical curative effect and safety of hyperplastic scar, explore a safe and effective clinical treatment. Methods By the method of retrospective analysis, 384 cases of hyperplastic scar patients, treated with random method (draw) group, according to different therapeutic methods are divided into 3 groups, group A of 126 cases with local injection of triamcinolone acetonide injection. Group B 128 cases treated by beauty skin care were applied. Of 130 cases of group C, 32p sticking therapy, the curative effect of patients after treatment of data. By comparing the χ2value of three groups of experimental data to verify the cure rate of the differences. Results After data analysis, A set of experimental cases 126 cases, cure rate 52.38%, the experimental group B cases 128 cases, cure rate 57.81%, the experimental group C cases 130 cases, cure rate 92.31%, after A year of follow-up data records and statistical analysis of clinical experiment results, the three groups after treatment to cure rate comparing two statistics: group A and group B cure rate differences had statistical significance (P>0.05), group A and group C cure rate difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), group B and C group cure rate difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Three methods (triamcinolone acetonide acetate injection, beauty skin care to stick and 32P patches) treatment, 32P sticking therapy is the most effective treatment for breast hyperplastic scar.%目的:探讨比较三种治疗方式(醋酸曲安奈德针、美皮护贴及32P敷贴)治疗增生性瘢痕的临床疗效及安全性,探寻一种更安全有效的临床治疗方式.方法:选择我院2013年01月-2016年01月在门诊治疗增生性瘢痕患者384例,根据治疗方式不同分为三组,A组126例,采用局部注射曲安奈德针;B组128例,采用美皮护贴敷治疗;C组130例,采用32P敷贴治疗.均随访1年,记录患者接受三种治疗方式的疗效数据.通过对比三组实验数据的χ2值来检验治愈率的差异.结果:经过数据分析,A组治疗病例126例,治愈率52.38%;B组治疗病例128例,治愈率57.81%;C组治疗病例130例,治愈率92.31%.对随访1年后的数据记录及临床实验结果统计分析,三组治疗后对治愈率进行两两统计比较:A组和B组治愈率差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05),A组和C组治愈率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),B组和C组治愈率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:三种方法(醋酸曲安奈德针、美皮护贴及32P敷贴)治疗中,32P敷贴治疗法是治疗增生性瘢痕的较为有效的方式.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号