Objective:To investigate the intervention effect of multiplex nutritional intervention for elderly hypertension in community.Methods:100 elderly patients with hypertension were randomly selected from December 2012 to December 2013.They were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group with 50 cases in each group.The control group used a simple type of nutrition intervention mode of nutrition education,and the experimental group adopted multiplex nutritional intervention mode of nutrition education.We compared the intervention effects between the two groups.Results:The systolic and diastolic blood pressure and body mass index and waist circumference of the experimental group hypertension patients values were(125.36±13.23)mmHg,(79.45±19.35)mmHg,(24.53±2.34) and(84.57±9.79)cm;the 4 index values of the control group hypertensive patients were(136.54±15.37)mmHg and(86.55±10.36)mmHg,(29.12±2.76) and(91.45±8.45)cm.The intervention effect of the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group,and the differences among the two groups with statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compare with the simple type of nutrition intervention,we use composite nutrition intervention to do the nutrition education for the elderly in the community hypertension patients,and the intervention effect is better.Therefore,this method is worthy of spreading and using.%目的:探讨复合式营养干预对社区老年人高血压的干预效果。方法:2012年12月-2013年12月随机选取老年高血压患者100例,并随机分为试验组和对照组各50例。对照组采用单纯式营养干预方式进行营养教育,试验组采用复合式营养干预方式进行营养教育,对比两组患者的干预效果。结果:试验组高血压人群收缩压、舒张压以及体重指数和腰围4个指标值分别为(125.36±13.23)mmHg、(79.45±19.35)mmHg、(24.53±2.34)km/m2和(84.57±9.79)cm,对照组高血压人群上述4个指标值分别为(136.54±15.37)mmHg、(86.55±10.36)mmHg、(29.12±2.76)km/m2和(91.45±8.45)cm。试验组干预效果明显好于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相比较单纯式营养干预方式,对社区老年人高血压患者采用复合式营养干预方式进行营养教育,具有更好的干预效果。因此,该方法值得进一步推广和使用。
展开▼