目的:探讨骨质疏松患者的有效护理方法。方法将200例骨质疏松患者随机划分为整体护理干预组与常规护理干预组,常规护理干预组采用常规性护理干预方法,整体护理干预组采用整体护理干预方法。结果整体护理干预组况明显优于常规护理干预组,对比差异明显,具有统计学意义。结论整体护理干预方法比常规护理方法更为有效。%ObjectiveExplore effective methods of nursing on patients with osteoporosis.Methods200 patients with osteoporosis were randomly divided into holistic nursing intervention group and usual care group, the usual care group received routine nursing interventions, and the holistic nursing group received holistic nursing interventions.Results The holistic nursing intervention group was signiifcantly better than usual care intervention group, it was significant differences with statistical significance.Conclusion Holistic nursing intervention is more effective than conventional methods of care, with the clinical and practical value.
展开▼