首页> 外文期刊>极地科学进展(英文版) >Comparison of two pretreatment methods for mercury stable isotope analysis in Antarctic moss
【24h】

Comparison of two pretreatment methods for mercury stable isotope analysis in Antarctic moss

机译:两种预处理方法对南极苔藓中汞稳定同位素分析的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Mercury (Hg) stable isotope analysis can provide new insight for understanding the biogeochemistry and sources of Hg in the polar regions. To completely extract the low contents of Hg in polar samples and to avoid isotopic fractionation during the sample preparation stage, an effective and reliable pretreatment method is needed. In this work, two different pretreatment methods were compared for measuring Hg stable isotopes in Antarctic moss samples. One method was acid digestion (HNO3︰H2O2=5︰3, v/v) and the second was a combustion-trapping treatment with a trapping solution (HNO3:HCl=2:1, v/v). There were no significant differences in the analytical results obtained with the two methods. The overall mean values and uncertainties of total Hg (THg) and the isotopic compositions of Hg in the referenced materials were all in good agreement with the certified and reported values, indicating that both methods were accurate and applicable. Acid digestion is highly efficient, while the combustion-trapping method can be used to treat samples with low Hg content. The proposed methods were successfully used to determine the Hg isotopic compositions in moss samples collected from the Antarctic.
机译:汞(Hg)稳定同位素分析可以为了解极地地区汞的生物地球化学和来源提供新的见解。为了完全提取极性样品中的低汞含量并避免在样品制备阶段进行同位素分馏,需要一种有效且可靠的预处理方法。在这项工作中,比较了两种不同的预处理方法来测量南极苔藓样品中的汞稳定同位素。一种方法是酸消解(HNO3∶H2O2 = 5∶3,v / v),第二种方法是用捕集溶液进行燃烧捕集处理(HNO3:HCl = 2:1,v / v)。两种方法获得的分析结果无显着差异。参考材料中总Hg(THg)的总体平均值和不确定性以及Hg的同位素组成均与已验证和报告的值高度吻合,表明这两种方法都是准确且适用的。酸消解效率很高,而燃烧捕集方法可用于处理汞含量低的样品。所提出的方法已成功用于测定从南极采集的苔藓样品中的汞同位素组成。

著录项

  • 来源
    《极地科学进展(英文版)》 |2017年第1期|75-80|共6页
  • 作者单位

    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;

    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;

    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;

    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 03:55:01
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号