“Hopf/homoclinic”簇放电和“SubHopf/homoclinic'簇放电之间的同步

摘要

以修正过的Morris-Lecar神经元模型为例,讨论了“Hopf/homoclinic”簇放电和“SubHopf/homoclinic"簇放电之间的同步行为.首先,分别考察了同一拓扑类型的两个耦合簇放电神经元的同步行为,发现“Hopf/homoclinic”簇放电比“SubHopf/homoclinic”簇放电达到膜电位完全同步所需要的耦合强度小,即前者比后者更容易达到膜电位完全同步.其次,对这两个不同拓扑类型的簇放电神经元的耦合同步行为进行了讨论.通过数值分析发现随着耦合强度的增加,两种不同类型的簇放电首先达到簇放电同步,然后当耦合强度足够大时甚至可以达到膜电位完全同步,并且同步后的放电类型更接近容易同步的簇放电类型,即“Hopf/homoclinic”簇放电.然而令人奇怪的是此时慢变量并没有达到完全同步,而是相位同步;慢变量之间呈现为一种线性关系.这一点和现有文献的结果截然不同.%Taking the modified Morris-Lecar neuron model for example, we consider the synchronous behaviour between "Hopf/homoclinic" bursting and "SubHopf/homoclinic" bursting. Firstly, the synchronization between two coupled bursting neurons with the same topo-logical type is investigated numerically, and the results show that the coupling strength reaching the synchronization of the membrane potential of "Hopf/homoclinic" bursting is smaller than that of "SubHopf/homoclinic" bursting, that is to say, the former can reach complete synchrony of the membrane potential more easily than the latter. Secondly, we study the synchronous behavior of two coupled bursting neurons with different topological types by numerical analysis, and find that with the increase of the coupling strength the two different types of bursting neurons reach the bursting-synchrony first, and then they can reach complete synchrony of the membrane potential when the coupling strength is strong enough, and the type of synchronous state is inclined to the type of easy synchronization, namely, "Hopf/homoclinic" bursting. To our surprise, the slow variables exhibit phase synchronization instead of complete synchronization. Moreover, there is a linear relationship between the both slow variables. This point is distinctly different from the results of the existing documents.