首页> 外文学位 >Human-computer interaction and cognition in e-learning environments---the effects of synchronous and asynchronous communication in knowledge development.
【24h】

Human-computer interaction and cognition in e-learning environments---the effects of synchronous and asynchronous communication in knowledge development.

机译:电子学习环境中的人机交互和认知-同步和异步通信对知识开发的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research study investigated the development of knowledge within e-learning environments when mediated by two different methods of communication---synchronous and asynchronous. The methodology of content organization and presentation selected was a tutorial-like methodology. Additionally, this research study approached human-computer interaction and cognition within e-learning environments, and student attitudes towards web-based learning courses.;The primarily population addressed by this study was professionals from the sectors of banking, insurance, and securities/investments in the realm of continuing and professional education. The sample population of 31 subjects was randomly chosen and divided into two groups: Group A of 18 subjects using the asynchronous method of communication, and group B of 13 subjects using the synchronous method of communication. Participants in this study were geographically dispersed across the U.S., being from the following 15 states: Washington, Oregon, California, South Dakota, Texas, Wisconsin, Illinois, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Connecticut.;The research study was composed of a pretest, posttest, and unit modules as provided by the Academy for Excellence in Financial Services Policy via the work of a subject matter expert, which was the same as the instructor. The attitude inventory test used a 25-item Likert-type inventory test, by means of a 5-point scale, from strongly agree to strongly disagree. In this study, a two-factor split-plot or mixed ANOVA design was utilized on the combined factors ACHIEVEMENT and METHOD and an independent-measure t test was utilized on METHOD.;On research question 1, there was a statistically significant difference F(1, 29) = 10.11, p .05 in the posttest variable which indicated that students using synchronous methods of communication in a tutorial-like web-based course performed better than those using asynchronous methods of communication, this performance being even more evident within the bank group sector. On research question 2, it was observed that there was not a statistically significant difference within the unit tests, showing that there were no differences in learning performance among students who used asynchronous or synchronous methods of interaction as measured by their raw scores on online course unit tests.;Regarding research question 3, it was observed that there were no differences in student attitude towards instruction among students who used asynchronous and synchronous methods of interaction as measured by their student attitude inventory test. Further analysis utilizing the factorial analysis method, this time considering the use of e-learning environments independent of the method of communication chosen, on the 25-item Likert-type inventory test showed that 28.01% of the participants demonstrated a positive attitude toward online instruction and 15.53% expressed some form of stress by taking the online course. Concerning research question 4, it was found that there was no interaction between variables METHOD and ACHIEVEMENT, which affects learning performance among students who learn using asynchronous or synchronous methods of interaction within a tutorial-like web-based course.
机译:这项研究研究了当通过两种不同的通信方法(同步和异步)进行介导时,电子学习环境中知识的发展。选择的内容组织和表示方法是一种类似于教程的方法。此外,本研究还研究了电子学习环境中的人机交互和认知以及学生对基于Web的学习课程的态度。该研究的主要对象是银行,保险和证券/投资领域的专业人员在继续和专业教育领域。随机选择了31名受试者的样本人口,并将其分为两组:A组使用异步通信方法的18个受试者,B组使用同步通信方法的13个受试者。这项研究的参与者分布在全美各地,分别来自以下15个州:华盛顿州,俄勒冈州,加利福尼亚州,南达科他州,德克萨斯州,威斯康星州,伊利诺伊州,路易斯安那州,北卡罗来纳州,南卡罗来纳州,乔治亚州,纽约州,宾夕法尼亚州,俄亥俄州,这项研究由金融服务政策卓越学院通过主题专家的工作提供的前测,后测和单元模块组成,该专家与讲师相同。态度清单测试使用25分的李克特型清单测试,通过5分制,从完全同意到完全不同意。在这项研究中,对组合因素成就和方法采用两因素分裂图或混合方差分析设计,对方法采用独立测量t检验。;在研究问题1上,有统计学显着性差异F( 1,29)= 10.11,p <.05,这表明在类似教程的基于Web的课程中,使用同步交流方法的学生比使用异步交流方法的学生表现更好,这种表现在银行集团部门。在研究问题2上,观察到单元测试中没有统计学上的显着差异,表明使用异步或同步互动方法的学生(根据在线课程单元上的原始分数来衡量)的学习成绩没有差异关于研究问题3,观察到在使用异步和同步交互方法的学生中,学生对教学的态度没有差异,这是通过学生态度调查测得的。使用因子分析方法进行的进一步分析,这次考虑使用与所选交流方法无关的电子学习环境,对25个项目的Likert型库存测试表明,有28.01%的参与者对在线指导持积极态度15.53%的人通过在线课程表达了某种形式的压力。关于研究问题4,发现变量METHOD和ACHIEVEMENT之间没有交互,这影响了在基于教程的基于Web的课程中使用异步或同步交互方法进行学习的学生的学习表现。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sistelos, Antonio J. C. M.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana State University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana State University.;
  • 学科 Education Adult and Continuing.;Education Technology of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 114 p.
  • 总页数 114
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号