首页> 外文学位 >A Parametricness Index and Consistency with Complexity Penalty for Model Selection.
【24h】

A Parametricness Index and Consistency with Complexity Penalty for Model Selection.

机译:模型选择的参数索引和复杂度惩罚的一致性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In model selection literature two classes of criteria perform well asymptotically in different situations: Bayesian information criterion (BIC) (as a representative) is consistent in selection when the true model is finite dimensional (parametric scenario); Akaike's information criterion (AIC) performs well when the true model is infinite dimensional (nonparametric scenario). But there is little work that addresses if it is possible and how to detect the situation that a specific model selection problem is in. In this work, we differentiate the two scenarios theoretically. We develop a measure, parametricness index (PI), to assess whether a model selected by a consistent procedure can be practically treated as the true model, which also hints on AIC or BIC is better suited for the data. A consequence is that by switching between AIC and BIC based on the PI, the resulting regression estimator is simultaneously asymptotically efficient for both parametric and nonparametric scenarios. In addition, we systematically investigate the behaviors of PI in simulation and real data and show its usefulness.;Traditionally, the consistency property of BIC type of criteria for model selection is derived with a fixed number of predictors. A natural question is: does the consistency property still hold in high dimensional setting? The answer is in the positive direction [18, 69]; however, there are serious limitations of the assumptions in [18, 69]. Specifically, in [18], the size of the true model is assumed to be bounded, which may exclude many applications. In [69], the conditions 2 assumes that the smallest eigenvalue of the covariance matrix of all the predictors is always positive, which could be a little unrealistic due to the correlation among all the predictors, especially when the number of predictors is large. And the condition 4 in [69] assumes that the smallest coefficient in the true model is higher than a certain order, which is reasonable, but the order could be improved. We provide sufficient conditions on consistency for BIC and similar types of criteria in high dimensional settings and show that these conditions are also necessary in a sense by giving counterexamples. We demonstrate that the results in [18, 69] are special cases of ours. Moreover, our results eliminate the the restriction in [18] on the size of the true model and relax the assumptions in [69] on the true model. We also generalize the concept of consistency and provide similar results to this new concept. A statistical risk bound for the model selected by the BIC type of criterion is also derived.
机译:在模型选择文献中,两类标准在不同情况下渐近表现良好:当真实模型为有限维(参数方案)时,贝叶斯信息标准(作为代表)在选择中是一致的;当真实模型是无穷维(非参数场景)时,赤池的信息准则(AIC)表现良好。但是,很少有工作解决可能的问题以及如何检测特定模型选择问题所在的情况。在这项工作中,我们从理论上区分了这两种情况。我们开发了一种参数参量指数(PI),以评估通过一致程序选择的模型是否可以实际视为真实模型,这也暗示AIC或BIC更适合于数据。结果是,通过基于PI在AIC和BIC之间进行切换,对于参数和非参数场景,所得回归估计器同时渐近有效。此外,我们系统地研究了PI在模拟和实际数据中的行为,并显示了其有效性。传统上,BIC类型的模型选择标准的一致性是由固定数量的预测变量得出的。一个自然的问题是:一致性属性是否仍然在高维设置中成立?答案是肯定的[18,69]。但是,[18,69]中的假设存在严重局限性。具体来说,在[18]中,假定真实模型的大小是有界的,这可能会排除许多应用。在[69]中,条件2假定所有预测变量的协方差矩阵的最小特征值始终为正,由于所有预测变量之间的相关性,这可能有些不现实,尤其是在预测变量数量较大时。并且[69]中的条件4假设真实模型中的最小系数高于某个阶数,这是合理的,但是阶数可以提高。我们为高维设置中的BIC和类似类型的标准提供了足够的一致性条件,并通过提供反例从某种意义上说明了这些条件也是必要的。我们证明[18,69]中的结果是我们的特殊情况。此外,我们的结果消除了[18]中对真实模型大小的限制,并放宽了[69]中对真实模型的假设。我们还将概括一致性的概念,并提供与该新概念相似的结果。还得出了按BIC类型的准则选择的模型的统计风险界限。

著录项

  • 作者

    Liu, Wei.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Statistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 140 p.
  • 总页数 140
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号