首页> 外文学位 >Economic Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Impact of the Chinese Investment on Trade, Agriculture and Infrastructure in Ethiopia and Kenya
【24h】

Economic Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Impact of the Chinese Investment on Trade, Agriculture and Infrastructure in Ethiopia and Kenya

机译:撒哈拉以南非洲的经济发展:中国投资对埃塞俄比亚和肯尼亚的贸易,农业和基础设施的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The growing presence of China in Africa has had both positive and negative impacts on the continent and its nations. As Chinese State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) are contributing to increase the economic development of 50 African states mostly throughout investments, the Chinese government's politic towards Africa has strengthened with its continuous development aid and grants in exchange of the exploitation and exploration of the continent's natural resources. However, with countries such as Ethiopia and Kenya lacking on natural resources, imports and exports on trade, agriculture and infrastructure cooperation grew rather modestly since 1970. As a result, China is arguably both countries' most important bilateral economic partner. Saddled on a spirited economic expansion towards enhancing self-reliance capability of African countries, China's growth in Africa has stroke the chord to the world's attention and stunned allies and opponents alike. While, friends perceive this alliance as a lucrative opportunity for both sides, critics are skeptical over the cooperation pointing out the potential impact of China's development aids towards enhancing the recipient countries self-reliance capabilities. As a matter of fact, issues such as the continuous utilization of Chinese labor and input during the implementation of such projects, and the lack of fair competitiveness on African markets have had many questioned the sincerity of China's intensions, in one hand, towards attaining mutual benefit and enhancing self-reliance with these recipient countries. China's drive to expand its political power and stature along its economic power, and African leaders' desire for economic progress are within what is defined as a realistic framework. On the other hand, a constructivist perspective centers on ideas in terms of shaping the actions of States, the opinions of state leaders, the media academics and mass public likewise.;Unlike Nigeria, Angola, or the Democratic Republic of Congo, both Ethiopia and Kenya have very few natural resources that would have made their cooperation with China either realistic or materialistic. But interestingly enough, their alliances with Chinese investors happen to be as important as it is with other nations for several other reasons. As the second most populous country in Africa, with a population of about 90 million people, following Nigeria, Ethiopia offers several economic, social and environmental indicators favorable for investment both in short and long terms. Its structural indicator embedded the multiple headquarters and institutions that dominate Addis Ababa for various international institutions such as the African Union (AU), the African Development Bank (AfDB), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) etc. As a matter of fact, the African Union was built with a grant assistance of US $200 million provided by China, which came up with a traditional Chinese style garden (Zander and Huang 2017, 12). Moreover, the partnership for Africa's development, supported by China was established in Addis Ababa and the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa has its headquarters in the capital city as well. It also is important to point out that though the country is ruled under a dictatorship regime, it is arguably considered as offering a stable political and economic environment with a liberalized economy in all major sectors and significant tax incentives.;Similarly to a much higher extent, critics contend that Kenya is widely regarded as an African example of a politically stable society, in which there is a broad participation in an expanding economy (WTO). Although the balance of power between competing interests within the one party framework often has been tenuous, Kenya offers a much attractive environment for foreign investment. Indeed, with one of the region's best performing currency, the country has a higher per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the region with US$63.49 billion in 2015 compared to Ethiopia's US $61.54 billion in 2015 (KNBS). Moreover, it has high social and structural indicators such as its population growth rate, educational attainment, life expectancy etc. Furthermore, unlike Ethiopia, it is a more open and liberal society with a multiparty-system versus a one party dominant system that reinforce the steadiness of its political environment. Indeed, the new constitution promulgated in 2010 has gone a long way in enhancing political stability with the separation of powers in the country. Moreover, Kenya's geographical location is strategic for investors aiming to access the East and Central African market that offer over 385 million consumers. In addition to that, regulatory reforms were instituted to simplify, make transparent and minimize the number of licensing requirements for investment. (Abstract shortened by ProQuest.).
机译:中国在非洲的存在不断增长,对非洲大陆及其国家产生了积极和消极的影响。随着中国国有企业(SOE)大部分在整个投资过程中为促进50个非洲国家的经济发展做出贡献,中国政府对非洲的政治态度得到了持续发展的援助和赠款,以换取该大陆自然资源的开发和利用。但是,由于埃塞俄比亚和肯尼亚等国家缺乏自然资源,自1970年以来,在贸易,农业和基础设施合作方面的进出口额均出现温和增长。因此,可以说中国是两国最重要的双边经济伙伴。中国为促进非洲国家的自力更生而进行了积极的经济扩张,中国在非洲的增长引起了全世界的关注,使盟友和反对者震惊。尽管朋友们认为该联盟对双方都是有利可图的机会,但批评人士对合作持怀疑态度,指出中国发展援助对增强受援国自力更生能力的潜在影响。事实上,诸如在执行此类项目期间不断利用中国劳动力和投入以及在非洲市场上缺乏公平竞争等问题使许多人质疑中国意图实现相互包容的诚意。受益并增强与这些受援国的自力更生。中国在沿着经济实力扩大政治力量和地位方面的努力,以及非洲领导人对经济发展的渴望都在定义的现实框架之内。另一方面,建构主义的观点集中在以下方面的思想:塑造国家的行动,国家领导人的观点,媒体学者和大众的观点。与埃塞俄比亚和尼日利亚,安哥拉或刚果民主共和国不同,尼日利亚肯尼亚很少有自然资源可以使与中国的合作变得现实或物质。但有趣的是,由于其他一些原因,它们与中国投资者的联盟与与其他国家的联盟同样重要。埃塞俄比亚是非洲第二大人口大国,仅次于尼日利亚,人口约为9000万,埃塞俄比亚提供了一些有利于短期和长期投资的经济,社会和环境指标。它的结构指标嵌入了在亚的斯亚贝巴占主导地位的多个总部和机构,供各种国际机构使用,例如非洲联盟(AU),非洲开发银行(AfDB),粮食及农业组织(FAO)等。事实上,非洲联盟是在中国提供的2亿美元赠款援助下兴建的,并提供了一个中国传统风格的花园(Zander and Huang 2017,12)。此外,在亚的斯亚贝巴建立了由中国支持的非洲发展伙伴关系,联合国非洲经济委员会也将其总部设在首都。同样重要的是要指出,尽管该国受独裁政权统治,但可以说它提供了稳定的政治和经济环境,所有主要部门的经济都自由化,税收优惠明显。批评者认为,肯尼亚被广泛认为是政治稳定社会的非洲范例,在这个社会中,广泛参与经济增长(WTO)。尽管一党制框架内相互竞争的利益之间的力量平衡常常是微弱的,但肯尼亚为外国投资提供了非常有吸引力的环境。的确,该国是该地区表现最好的货币之一,其人均国内生产总值(GDP)较高,2015年为634.9亿美元,而埃塞俄比亚2015年为615.4亿美元(KNBS)。此外,它具有较高的社会和结构指标,例如人口增长率,教育程度,预期寿命等。此外,与埃塞俄比亚不同,它是一个更加开放和自由的社会,多党制而非一党专制主导了社会。政治环境稳定。的确,2010年颁布的新宪法在加强国家三权分立的政治稳定方面已经走了很长一段路。此外,肯尼亚的地理位置对于旨在进入拥有超过3.85亿消费者的东非和中非市场的投资者而言具有战略意义。除此之外,还进行了监管改革,以简化,透明化并使投资许可要求的数量降至最低。 (摘要由ProQuest缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Northeastern Illinois University.;

  • 授予单位 Northeastern Illinois University.;
  • 学科 Political science.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 107 p.
  • 总页数 107
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:56

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号