首页> 外文学位 >The comparison between fractional-N frequency synthesizer architecture and flying-adder frequency synthesizer architecture.
【24h】

The comparison between fractional-N frequency synthesizer architecture and flying-adder frequency synthesizer architecture.

机译:小数N分频频率合成器架构与飞加法频率合成器架构的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A Frequency synthesizer is one of the most critical components in digital and analog systems. The Fractional-N frequency synthesis has been popular since its invention in the 1980s. The Flying-adder synthesizer was invented by TI in 2000 and has been widely used in many of their products. The purpose of this thesis is to perform a thorough comparison between these two architectures and gain deeper insights into the advantages and limitations of both architectures.;The thesis starts with an in-depth study and simulation on both architectures individually. For the fractional-N synthesizer, two cases are studied: with and without sigma-delta modulator. Different structures of phase detectors and the influence of 1st and 3rd order sigma-delta modulators are analyzed. In addition, through the analyses of power spectrum and phase noise, we are able to predict the locations of the fractional spurs.;For the Flying-Adder synthesizer, two cases are also studied: with and without random dithering. We find that the number of VCO stages plays a key role in the tuning range and the noise performances. Phase noise, power spectrum analysis and the prediction of the fractional spurs are studied and simulated extensively.;With the understanding of both architectures, a comparison is performed between them in terms of system speed, noise performance, tuning range, and the locations of fractional spurs. The pros and the cons of the fractional-N and Flying-Adder architectures are illustrated in the thesis.;Finally, with an in-depth understanding of both architectures, a new approach that combines the advantages of both fractional-N and Flying-Adder techniques is proposed at the end of the thesis. Extensive simulations are performed to validate the concept.
机译:频率合成器是数字和模拟系统中最关键的组件之一。自从1980年代发明以来,小数N频率合成一直很受欢迎。 TI于2000年发明了flying-adder合成器,并已广泛用于其许多产品中。本文的目的是对这两种体系结构进行全面的比较,以深入了解这两种体系结构的优点和局限性。本文从对这两种体系结构的深入研究和仿真开始。对于分数N合成器,研究了两种情况:带和不带sigma-delta调制器。分析了鉴相器的不同结构以及一阶和三阶sigma-delta调制器的影响。此外,通过对功率谱和相位噪声的分析,我们能够预测分数杂散的位置。对于飞加法合成器,还研究了两种情况:有和没有随机抖动。我们发现,VCO级数在调谐范围和噪声性能中起着关键作用。对相位噪声,功率谱分析和小数杂散的预测进行了广泛的研究和模拟。;在了解了两种架构之后,在系统速度,噪声性能,调整范围和小数的位置方面对它们进行了比较。马刺。论文阐述了分数N和Flying-Adder架​​构的优缺点。最后,在对这两种架构都有深入的了解之后,结合了分数N和Flying-Adder的优点的一种新方法论文的最后提出了一些技巧。进行了广泛的仿真以验证这一概念。

著录项

  • 作者

    Huang, Chen-Wei.;

  • 作者单位

    Southern Methodist University.;

  • 授予单位 Southern Methodist University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Electronics and Electrical.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 130 p.
  • 总页数 130
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 无线电电子学、电信技术;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号