首页> 外文学位 >Levels of stress and mechanisms of coping among male freshman athletes.
【24h】

Levels of stress and mechanisms of coping among male freshman athletes.

机译:男一年级运动员的压力水平和应对机制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Context. Studies on freshman athletes stress levels and mechanisms of coping are lacking in frequency. This study is being performed to further the knowledge base dealing with stress and coping in the freshman collegiate population Objective. The purpose of this study is to identify the levels of stress and the mechanisms of coping with stress among male freshman Football and Soccer athletes. Design. First design will be a 1X3 factorial design for stress using the Quick Stress Questionnaire (QSQ). The second design will incorporate descriptive statistics using percentages to examine coping via the Brief COPE Questionnaire (BCQ). Setting. This study will be performed at Waynesburg University. Patients and other participants. 80 athletes will be included in this study from a sample of convenience at Waynesburg University. There will be no assignment or randomization of subjects, nor will a control group exist. Subjects will be based on the number of football and soccer athletes that volunteer to be in the study. Interventions. The questionnaires included consist of the Brief Cope Questionnaire (BCQ), the Quick Stress Questionnaire (QSQ), and ten demographic questions used to gather responses. These will be administered at three time points throughout the semester in a pre, mid, and post test fashion utilizing a lecture located in Stewart Hall at Waynesburg University. Main outcomes measures. There will be a significant difference in the levels of stress during the three time points among freshman male football and soccer athletes. There will be a difference in the number and types of positive and negative coping mechanisms described by freshman male Football and Soccer athletes based on the responses from the questionnaires. Athletes will experience significantly higher levels of stress when comparing the pre-test to post-test, followed by the pre-test to mid-test, and lastly the mid-test to post-test. Based on the responses male freshman football and soccer athletes will employ more negative coping mechanisms when comparing the pre-test to post-test, followed by the pre-test to mid-test, and lastly the mid-test to post-test. Finally, based on the responses male freshman football and soccer athletes will employ more avoidance coping strategies when comparing the pre-test to post-test, followed by the pre-test to mid-test, and lastly the mid-test to post-test. Results. A significant difference was noted in regards to Social/Personal relationships in the athletic population (F1,43 = .179, p = .025, ES = .084, beta-1 = .686). No other significant differences were noted based on the statistical analysis of the Quick Stress Questionnaire. Percentage of responses for the QSQ indicate that all levels of stress never exceeded a low to moderate status. It was also noted based on the results of the Brief Cope Questionnaire that athletes employ more positive coping mechanisms than negative coping mechanisms. Conclusion. Based on the results of this research study, students experienced more stress at the time of pre-test questionnaire administration than at the mid test or post-test. Also, athletes at Waynesburg University employ more positive coping mechanisms than negative coping mechanisms. However, there is a need for further research in this area.
机译:上下文。对新生运动员的压力水平和应对机制的研究缺乏频率。正在进行这项研究,以扩大大学新生群体中应对压力和应对的知识基础。这项研究的目的是确定男性新生足球和足球运动员的压力水平以及应对压力的机制。设计。第一个设计将是使用快速压力问卷(QSQ)进行压力的1X3析因设计。第二种设计将结合使用百分比的描述性统计数据,以通过《简要COPE问卷》(BCQ)检查应对措施。设置。这项研究将在韦恩斯堡大学进行。患者和其他参与者。韦恩斯堡大学的便利性样本将包括80名运动员。没有受试者的分配或随机分组,也没有对照组。主题将基于自愿参加研究的足球运动员的数量。干预措施。问卷包括简短应对问卷(BCQ),快速压力问卷(QSQ)以及用于收集回答的十个人口统计学问题。这些课程将在整个学期的三个时间点以考试前,考试中和考试后的方式,通过位于韦恩斯堡大学Stewart Hall的讲座进行管理。主要结果指标。新生男足球和足球运动员在三个时间点的压力水平将有显着差异。根据调查问卷的回答,新生男足和足球运动员描述的正面和负面应对机制的数量和类型将有所不同。在比较测试前与测试后,测试前与测试中,以及最后测试中与测试后,运动员的压力水平将显着提高。根据这些回答,在比较测试前与测试后,测试前与测试中,以及测试后与测试之间,男性新生足球和足球运动员将采用更多的负面应对机制。最后,根据回答,男性大一学生和足球运动员在比较测试前与测试后,随后的测试前与测试中,以及最后测试中与测试后时,将采用更多的回避应对策略。 。结果。在运动人群中,社交/人际关系方面存在显着差异(F1,43 = .179,p = .025,ES = .084,beta-1 = .686)。根据“快速应激问卷”的统计分析,没有发现其他显着差异。 QSQ的响应百分比表明,所有压力水平都从未超过过低到中度状态。根据简短应对调查表的结果还指出,运动员采用的是积极的应对机制,而不是消极的应对机制。结论。根据这项研究的结果,学生在进行测试前问卷调查时比在中期测试或测试后经历的压力更大。同样,韦恩斯堡大学的运动员采用的是积极的应对机制,而不是消极的应对机制。但是,需要在这一领域进行进一步的研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    White, Gregory A.;

  • 作者单位

    West Virginia University.;

  • 授予单位 West Virginia University.;
  • 学科 Clinical psychology.;Educational psychology.;Recreation.;Behavioral psychology.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 92 p.
  • 总页数 92
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号