首页> 外文学位 >Pro turpitudine vitae: The expulsion of nuns in the dioceses of Paris and Laon, 1100--1150.
【24h】

Pro turpitudine vitae: The expulsion of nuns in the dioceses of Paris and Laon, 1100--1150.

机译:Pro turpitudine vitae:驱逐巴黎和拉昂教区的修女,1100--1150年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 1107, the nuns of Saint-Eloi were charged with immorality and expelled from their monastery by Bishop Galo of Paris. A similar accusation was made in 1128 at the monastery of Saint-Jean in the diocese of Laon, and again in 1129 at Argenteuil in the diocese of Paris. Scholars have frequently linked these reforms, suggesting one as a precedent for another, but have rarely examined them in greater depth. Yet these are not the only historical examples of reform through expulsion during the twelfth century, simply the most famous. Therefore the purpose of this dissertation is to increase our understanding of the use of expulsion as a method of reform through an in-depth study of the historical, social, and political context of the reforms at Saint-Eloi, Saint-Jean, and Argenteuil.;Through a careful analysis of royal, papal, and episcopal charters directly related to the expulsion, as well as a wider examination of each bishop's reforming activities within his diocese, we learn that the three key issues in these reforms were reputation, corrigibility, and jurisdiction. Each of our monastic communities had gained a negative reputation in the years preceding their expulsion, although this sinistra fama was not exclusively a matter of sexual misconduct. Furthermore, in two of our three cases the bishop responsible for the expulsion carefully asserted that numerous attempts had been made to correct the nuns, thus the expelled community is labeled as incorrigible. Finally, there is the matter of episcopal and proprietary jurisdiction. These monasteries were not truly independent. Rather, they were subject to the episcopal jurisdiction of their bishop, and in two of these cases, as royal monasteries, they were subject to the proprietary jurisdiction of the king. Therefore in these expulsions we see collaboration between the bishop, who held episcopal jurisdiction over these communities, and the king, the holder of proprietary jurisdiction, in the reform of communities of nuns during the first half of the twelfth century.
机译:1107年,圣埃洛伊(Saint-Eloi)的尼姑被指控不道德,并被巴黎主教加洛(Bishop Galo)驱逐出修道院。 1128年,在拉昂教区的圣让修道院中做出了类似的指责,1129年,在巴黎教区的阿让特伊又提出了类似的指控。学者们经常将这些改革联系在一起,认为其中一项改革是另一项改革的先例,但很少深入研究它们。然而,这些并不是最著名的十二世纪通过驱逐进行改革的唯一历史例子。因此,本论文的目的是通过深入研究圣埃洛伊,圣让和阿让特伊的改革的历史,社会和政治背景,来加深我们对驱逐作为改革方法的理解通过仔细分析与驱逐直接相关的王室,罗马教皇和主教宪章,以及对每个主教在其教区内的改革活动进行更广泛的考察,我们了解到,这些改革中的三个关键问题是声誉,可矫正性,和管辖权。在被驱逐之前的几年中,我们每个修道院社区都获得了负面的声誉,尽管这种“ sinistra fama”并非仅是性行为问题。此外,在我们的三起案件中,负责驱逐的主教在两起案件中断言,曾进行过多次纠正修女的尝试,因此被驱逐的社区被贴上不可救药的标签。最后,还有主教和专有管辖权的问题。这些修道院并不是真正独立的。相反,他们受主教的主教管辖,在其中两个案件中,作为皇家修道院,他们受国王的专有管辖。因此,在这些驱逐中,我们看到对这些社区负主教管辖权的主教与专有管辖权的持有者国王在十二世纪上半叶的修女社区改革中进行了合作。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schulze, Catherine Elise.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 History Church.;History Medieval.;History European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 241 p.
  • 总页数 241
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号