首页> 外文学位 >To collaborate or not to collaborate: An exploratory model of the determinants of public administrators' attitudes toward intersectoral collaborations.
【24h】

To collaborate or not to collaborate: An exploratory model of the determinants of public administrators' attitudes toward intersectoral collaborations.

机译:进行协作还是不进行协作:探索公共管理员对部门间协作态度的决定因素的模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A great deal of research has been conducted to address questions such as what is collaboration? why collaborate? how can collaboration be implemented successfully? and how can collaborative efforts be evaluated conceptually and normatively? Though public administrators' positive attitudes toward collaborations are regarded as a determining factor for successful collaborations, what factors might influence those attitudes and have we overlooked how those attitudes are shaped?;Culled from the literature on inter-organization studies, neo-institutional economics, network management theory and collaboration theory, this study attempts to establish the construct of public administrators' attitudes toward intersectoral collaborations and build up an exploratory model explaining how five sets of influencing factors--environmental factors, organizational factors, personal factors, perceived benefits and cost factors-- shape those attitudes.;Given the important role Chief Administrative Officers (CAOs) and city managers are playing in making and implementing public policy in the daily administration of U.S. cities, this study specifically focused on intersectoral collaborations proactively initiated by CAOs and city managers. Based on the data collected from a national survey sent to CAOs and city managers working for U.S cities with populations over 25,000, the proposed exploratory model was tested empirically by ordinary least square and ordered logit regressions. Based on the data analysis, the following four research questions are addressed. (1) To what extent and in what areas do municipal public administrators proactively initiate intersectoral collaborations to address complicated policy problems within their jurisdictions? or (2) Why do city administrators proactively initiate and sustain intersectoral collaborations? What are their motives? (3) What are city administrators concerned with when making a decision to initiate intersectoral collaborations? (4) What factors influence public administrators' attitudes toward intersectoral collaborations? Why do some public administrators proactively pursue intersectoral collaborations but others do not?;Primary findings of this study are: (1) CAOs and city managers are playing a very important role in initiating intersectoral collaborations. The majority of CAOs and city managers reported that in the last two years they initiated and formed collaborations with at least one nongovernmental entity in their jurisdictions. Nonprofit organizations are the primary collaborators for governments. Intersectoral collaborations initiated by CAOs and city managers rarely involved private businesses or citizen groups alone. (2) Currently the majority of intersectoral collaborations remain at the second developmental stage, sharing resources. The ideal form of intersectoral collaborations strongly advocated by students of collaborations-- governments, private businesses, nonprofit organizations and citizen groups collaborating together, sharing resources, knowledge, power and responsibilities to address complicated social and economic problems--are still more rhetoric than reality. (3) The construct of public administrators' attitudes toward intersectoral collaborations are established by factor analysis and regression analyses, and consists of three dimensions: general belief, perceived jurisdictional appropriateness, and behavioral intention. Though the concept of intersectoral collaborations has been touted and promoted by the mass media, scholars of public administration and professional associations, there indeed exist significant variations in public administrators' attitudes toward intersectoral collaborations. The discrepancies among their attitudes are more salient when moving from the dimension of general belief to the dimension of behavioral intention. (4) CAOs and city managers' positive attitudes toward intersectoral collaborations in terms of general belief, perceived jurisdictional appropriateness and behavioral intention are primarily driven by their perceived benefits of intersectoral collaborations. Except for the significant negative impact of perceived loss of organizational autonomy on perceived jurisdictional appropriateness, none of the perceived costs of intersectoral collaborations, including administrative costs and accountability, are statistically significant in all regression models. (5) Besides supporting the arguments of resource dependence, and exchange theories that organizations initiate collaboration in order to get resources from their environment, legitimacy enhancement is the most important force that shapes CAOs and city managers' attitudes toward intersectoral collaborations. (6) Though as feminists argued, this study indeed finds that female public administrators may be more positive influences on intersectoral collaborations than male public administrators, the gender difference, nonetheless, is only significant at the normative level, i.e., general belief. (7) CAOs and city managers' behavioral intentions toward intersectoral collaboration are really pragmatically oriented, which indicates that to collaborate or not is indeed a strategic choice of public administrators. The more that complicated policy problems are recognized, the more potential collaborators are available, the less organizational rigidities are perceived, the more benefits such as efficiency attainments, capacity building and legitimacy enhancement can be achieved, the more they are familiar with nongovernmental entities within their jurisdictions, the more likely CAOs and city managers would proactively pursue intersectoral collaborations. Personal factors such as prior experience, personal propensity to trust, gender, age, education, working experience and professional affiliations do not show significant influence on the behavioral intentions of CAOs and city managers toward intersectoral collaborations. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:为了解决诸如什么是协作之类的问题,已经进行了大量研究。为什么要合作?如何成功实施协作?怎样才能从概念和规范上评估合作的努力?尽管公共管理者对协作的积极态度被视为成功协作的决定因素,但哪些因素可能会影响这些态度,而我们却忽略了这些态度的形成方式?;摘自组织间研究,新制度经济学,网络管理理论和协作理论,本研究试图建立公共管理员对部门间协作的态度,并建立探索模型来解释五组影响因素-环境因素,组织因素,个人因素,感知收益和成本考虑因素-塑造这些态度。;鉴于首席行政官(CAO)和城市经理在美国城市日常行政管理中制定和实施公共政策方面发挥着重要作用,因此本研究特别关注CAO和城市积极发起的部门间合作经理。根据发给CAO和为人口超过25,000的美国城市工作的城市经理的全国调查收集的数据,通过普通最小二乘和有序logit回归对建议的探索性模型进行了经验检验。基于数据分析,解决了以下四个研究问题。 (1)市级公共行政管理人员在何种程度上和哪些领域主动发起跨部门合作,以解决其辖区内的复杂政策问题?或(2)为什么城市管理员要主动发起并维持部门间的合作?他们的动机是什么? (3)在决定启动跨部门合作时,城市管理者关注什么? (4)哪些因素影响公共管理者对部门间合作的态度?为什么有些公共管理人员会主动进行部门间合作,而其他人则不这样做?;本研究的主要发现是:(1)CAO和城市管理者在发起部门间协作中扮演着非常重要的角色。大多数CAO和城市经理报告说,在过去两年中,他们与辖区内至少一个非政府实体发起并建立了合作关系。非营利组织是政府的主要合作者。由首席审计官和城市经理发起的部门间合作很少涉及私营企业或公民团体。 (2)目前,大多数部门间合作仍处于第二发展阶段,共享资源。学生,学生,政府,私营企业,非营利组织和公民团体共同倡导,共享资源,知识,权力和责任以解决复杂的社会和经济问题,是学生们大力倡导的理想的部门间合作形式,但仍然比现实更夸张。 (3)通过因素分析和回归分析,建立了公共管理者对部门间合作态度的建构,它包括三个方面:一般信念,感知的司法管辖权适当性和行为意图。尽管跨部门合作的概念已经被大众媒体,公共行政学者和专业协会所吹捧和提倡,但公共管理者对跨部门合作的态度确实存在着很大的差异。从一般信仰的维度转向行为意图的维度时,他们态度之间的差异更加突出。 (4)CAO和城市管理者对部门间合作的总体态度,感知的司法管辖权适当性和行为意图的积极态度主要是由他们对部门间协作的收益的驱动。除了感知到的组织自治权丧失对感知的司法管辖权适当性的重大负面影响外,跨部门合作的感知成本(包括行政成本和问责制)在所有回归模型中均无统计学意义。 (5)除了支持资源依赖的论据以及交换组织发起协作以从其环境中获取资源的理论外,合法性增强是塑造CAO和城市管理者对部门间协作态度的最重要力量。 (6)尽管如女权主义者所言,这项研究确实发现女性公共行政人员可能比男性公共行政人员对部门间合作产生更积极的影响,但性别差异仅在规范层面具有重要意义。,即一般信仰。 (7)CAO和城市管理者对部门间协作的行为意图实际上是务实的,这表明是否进行协作确实是公共管理者的战略选择。人们越了解复杂的政策问题,就越有潜在的合作者,对组织的僵硬感越少,就越能实现效率,能力建设和合法性增强等利益,他们对非政府实体的了解就越多。司法管辖区,CAO和城市管理者更有可能积极开展部门间合作。个人因素,例如先前的经验,个人的信任倾向,性别,年龄,教育程度,工作经验和专业从属关系,并未对CAO和城市管理者跨部门合作的行为意图产生重大影响。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Yu, Wenxuan.;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - Newark.;

  • 授予单位 Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - Newark.;
  • 学科 Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 310 p.
  • 总页数 310
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号