首页> 外文学位 >Ethnic groups and institutions: A study of institutional engineering in four Central and Eastern European countries.
【24h】

Ethnic groups and institutions: A study of institutional engineering in four Central and Eastern European countries.

机译:族裔群体和机构:对中欧和东欧四个国家的机构工程的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The issue of institutional engineering has gained a renewed interest with the democratic transitions of the Central and Eastern European countries, as for some states it has become a matter of state survival. The four countries examined in the study -- Macedonia, Slovakia, Romania and Bulgaria -- exemplify the difficulty in establishing a stable democratic society in the context of the resurgence of national identity. The success of ethnonational minorities in achieving the desired policies affirming or expanding their rights as a group was conditioned upon the cohesion of the minority as well as the permissiveness of state institutions in terms of participation and representation of minority members. The Hungarian minorities in Slovakia and Romania, the Turkish minority in Bulgaria, and the Albanian minority in Macedonia, formed their political organizations to represent their interests. However, in some cases the divergence of strategies or goals between factions of the minority group seriously impeded its ability to obtain the desired concessions from the majority.;The difficulty in the pursuit of policies favoring the expansion of minority rights was further exacerbated in some of the cases by the impermissiveness of political institutions. The political parties representing the interest of ethnonational minorities were allowed to participate in elections, although not without suspicions about their intent and even strong opposition from majority groups, but participation in elections and subsequent representation in legislative bodies did not translate into adoption of the desired policies. The ethnonational minorities' inability to effectively influence the decision-making process was the result of the inadequacy of democratic institutions to process these demands and channel them through the normal political process in the absence of majority desire to accommodate them. Despite the promise of democratic institutions to bring about a major overhaul of the policies of forceful assimilation and disregard for minority rights, the four cases analyzed in the study demonstrate that in effect ethnonational minorities continued to be at the mercy of the majority, especially if the minority was unable to position itself as a balancing actor.
机译:随着中欧和东欧国家的民主过渡,制度工程问题引起了人们的新兴趣,对于某些国家来说,这已成为国家生存的问题。研究中考察的四个国家-马其顿,斯洛伐克,罗马尼亚和保加利亚-体现了在民族认同复兴的情况下建立稳定的民主社会的困难。民族少数群体能否成功实现确认或扩大其群体权利的理想政策,取决于少数群体的凝聚力以及国家机构在少数群体成员的参与和代表性方面的允许性。斯洛伐克和罗马尼亚的匈牙利少数民族,保加利亚的土耳其少数民族和马其顿的阿尔巴尼亚少数民族组成了代表自己利益的政治组织。然而,在某些情况下,少数群体各派之间战略或目标的分歧严重阻碍了其从多数群体中获得所需让步的能力。在某些情况下,推行有利于扩大少数群体权利的政策的困难进一步加剧。案件是由于政治制度的不容许。代表民族少数群体利益的政党获准参加选举,尽管并非毫无怀疑其意图,甚至遭到多数派团体的强烈反对,但参加选举和随后在立法机构中的代表并没有转化为通过所需政策。种族少数群体无法有效影响决策过程是民主机构不足以处理这些要求,并在没有多数人希望容纳它们的情况下通过正常的政治进程引导它们的结果。尽管民主机构曾承诺彻底改革强力同化和无视少数群体权利的政策,但该研究中分析的四个案例表明,实际上,民族少数派仍然受到多数人的摆布,特别是如果少数派无法将自己定位为平衡演员。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ilcheva, Maria.;

  • 作者单位

    Florida International University.;

  • 授予单位 Florida International University.;
  • 学科 East European Studies.;Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.;Political Science General.;Engineering Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 296 p.
  • 总页数 296
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号