首页> 外文学位 >A Validation Study of Self-Reported Behavior: Can College Student Self-Reports of Behavior Be Accepted as Being Self-Evident?
【24h】

A Validation Study of Self-Reported Behavior: Can College Student Self-Reports of Behavior Be Accepted as Being Self-Evident?

机译:自我报告行为的验证研究:是否可以接受大学生的自我报告是不言而喻的?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dearth of institution-reported data describing college student behaviors forces higher education researchers to rely upon self-reported behaviors collected via surveys and summarized by the survey statistic. If bias is present and substantive, the invalid, self-reported input data threatens the validity of research conclusions that guide co-curricular and academic policies and best practices at institutions of higher education. This study evaluates the premise of self-reported data validity upon which survey research is based. Potential sources of bias include (1) response bias from inaccurate self-reporting and (2) nonresponse bias where characteristics of respondents differ from those of nonrespondents. The assumption of survey statistic validity depends upon it being an unbiased estimate of behavior in a target population that relies on survey responses being free from systematic biases, an assumption that has not been adequately tested in the literature. This validation study of self-reported behaviors compares institution-reported, transactional data to corresponding self-reported academic performance, class attendance, and co-curricular participation from a sample of 6,000 students, using the Model of the Response Process by Tourangeau (1984, 1987). Response bias, observed as measurement error, is significant in 11 of the 13 questions asked and evaluated in this study. Socially desirable behaviors include campus recreation facility (CRF) use and academic success being overstated as much as three times. Nonresponse bias, observed as nonresponse error, is also significant in 11 of the same 13 questions asked and evaluated with high GPA and participatory students over represented in the survey statistic. For most of the questions, measurement error and nonresponse error combine to misstate behavior by at least 20%. The behaviors most affected are CRF use, which is overstated by 112% to 248%; semester GPA self-reports of 3.36 versus an actual value of 3.04; and co-curricular participation that misstated by between -21% to +46%. This validation study sufficiently demonstrates that measurement error and nonresponse error are present in the self-reported data collected for the commonly studied topics in higher education that were represented by the 13 questions. Researchers using self-reported data cannot presume the survey statistic to be an unbiased estimate of actual behavior that it is generalizable to larger populations.
机译:缺乏机构报告的描述大学生行为的数据,迫使高等教育研究人员依靠通过调查收集并由调查统计数据汇总的自我报告的行为。如果存在偏见并且存在实质性偏见,则无效的,自我报告的输入数据将威胁研究结论的有效性,这些结论指导高等教育机构的课程和学术政策以及最佳实践。本研究评估了调查研究所基于的自我报告数据有效性的前提。偏见的潜在来源包括(1)不正确的自我报告造成的反应偏见和(2)受访者的特征与未受访者的特征不同的无回应偏见。调查统计有效性的假设取决于它是目标人群行为的无偏估计,它依赖于没有系统偏见的调查回答,这一假设尚未在文献中得到充分检验。这项关于自我报告行为的验证研究采用了Tourangeau(1984, 1987)。在本研究提出和评估的13个问题中,有11个问题中的响应偏差(被视为测量误差)很明显。社会上令人满意的行为包括校园娱乐设施(CRF)的使用和学术成功被夸大了三倍。在回答高和平均绩点高且参与统计的学生人数最多的13个问题中,有11个问题中有11个的无回答偏差也被认为是无回答错误,这一点也很明显。对于大多数问题,测量误差和无响应误差会导致错误陈述行为的组合至少增加20%。受影响最大的行为是使用CRF,这被夸大了112%至248%;每学期的GPA自我报告为3.36,而实际值为3.04;课外参与则介于-21%至+ 46%之间。这项验证研究充分证明,在针对13个问题所代表的高等教育常见问题的自我报告数据中,存在测量误差和无响应误差。研究人员使用自我报告的数据,不能将调查统计数字假定为对大范围人群而言可以推广的实际行为的无偏估计。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    North Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 North Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Education policy.;Social research.;Educational tests measurements.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 298 p.
  • 总页数 298
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号