首页> 外文学位 >Growth and diversification in U.S. agriculture: Farm level analysis of cost structure under risk and uncertainty.
【24h】

Growth and diversification in U.S. agriculture: Farm level analysis of cost structure under risk and uncertainty.

机译:美国农业的增长和多样化:风险和不确定性下的农场结构成本结构分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Initially, we analyze growth and diversification of U.S. dairy, corn, wheat, apple, and beef farms by examining longitudinal changes in ten size cohorts through three successive censuses. In dairy, we reject Gibrat's law and the mean reversion hypothesis of growth. Growth rates appear bimodal where the smallest and largest farm cohorts grow fastest. All cohorts diversify but the largest farms do not diversify as rapidly as medium-sized farms. These data suggest that scale economies persist even for the largest cohort of US dairy farms and scale economies dominate scope economies for large farms. For the other industries, we fail to reject Gibrat's law in apple and wheat industries and the mean reversion hypothesis in beef and corn industries. Apple and wheat farms diversify over time. Findings suggest that scale economies diminish for large farms across all four industries and scope economies dominate scale economies for large apple and wheat farms.;Then, we examine scope economies and risk aversion, two forces that simultaneously determine diversification. We jointly estimate scope economies and determine risk preferences under price uncertainty. We reject risk neutrality in favor of IARA and IRRA. Scope economies are significant but diminish with farm size. Increasing returns to scale exist in the production of multiple enterprises and diminish with size. Large farms operate under decreasing returns to scale. Ignoring risk preferences, a common practice in empirical work, results in an underestimate of the effect of scope economies for large farms.;Finally, we examine the impact of marketing contracts on farm cost structure and implied scale and scope economies for samples of dairy corn and wheat industries. We use the Modern Portfolio Theory to explain the increase in returns from diversifying marketing schemes. Assuming risk preferences and price uncertainty, we estimate the contract adoption decision, risk preferences, and structural parameters simultaneously. We derive measures of economies for both contracting and non-contracting farms. We find that marketing contracts improved the returns for corn and wheat farms, but not for dairy farm. Finally, having diversified marketing schemes is found to benefit only corn farms.
机译:最初,我们通过三个连续的人口普查研究了十个规模群体的纵向变化,从而分析了美国奶业,玉米,小麦,苹果和牛肉农场的增长和多样化。在乳制品行业,我们拒绝吉布拉特定律和增长的均值回归假设。增长率似乎是双峰的,最小和最大的农场群体增长最快。所有的人群都在多样化,但是最大的农场的多样化速度没有中型农场快。这些数据表明,即使在美国最大的奶牛场中,规模经济仍然存在,规模经济在大型农场的规模经济中占主导地位。对于其他行业,我们未能拒绝苹果和小麦行业的吉布拉特定律以及牛肉和玉米行业的均值回归假设。苹果和小麦农场随着时间的推移而多样化。研究结果表明,在所有四个行业中,大型农场的规模经济都在减少,而规模经济则在大型苹果和小麦农场的规模经济中占主导地位。然后,我们考察了范围经济和风险规避,这两个因素同时决定了多元化。我们共同估算范围经济并确定价格不确定性下的风险偏好。我们拒绝风险中立,而支持IARA和IRRA。范围经济很重要,但随着农场规模的缩小而减少。规模扩大的收益存在于多个企业的生产中,并且规模不断缩小。大型农场的经营规模效益不断下降。忽略风险偏好,这是经验工作的一种普遍做法,导致对大型农场的范围经济的影响被低估了。最后,我们研究了销售合同对农场成本结构的影响以及乳制玉米样品的隐含规模和范围经济。和小麦产业。我们使用现代投资组合理论来解释多元化营销计划带来的收益增加。假设风险偏好和价格不确定性,我们同时估计合同采用决策,风险偏好和结构参数。我们得出了订约农场和非订约农场的经济指标。我们发现,营销合同提高了玉米和小麦农场的收益,但没有增加奶牛场的收益。最后,发现多样化的营销计划仅对玉米农场有利。

著录项

  • 作者

    Melhim, Almuhanad.;

  • 作者单位

    Washington State University.;

  • 授予单位 Washington State University.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 144 p.
  • 总页数 144
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号