首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of tuition disparities among city, suburban, town, and rural public community colleges.
【24h】

A comparison of tuition disparities among city, suburban, town, and rural public community colleges.

机译:城市,郊区,城镇和农村公共社区学院之间的学费差距比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine differences in tuition rates and college affordability indexes (CAIs) between and among U.S. public community colleges formulated upon urbanization criteria extracted from the Integrated Post Secondary Data System (IPEDS) maintained by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), which operates under the United States (U.S.) Department of Education. The study compiled a data base of full-time, in-taxing district tuition, in-state tuition, out-of-state tuition, and CAIs for U.S. public community colleges. The study compared full-time in-district tuition, in-state tuition, out-of-state tuition, and CAIs between and among selected U.S. public community colleges by degree of institutional urbanization. A multi-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the hypothesis. Post-hoc tests were utilized when ANOVA indicated statistical differences among data.Analyses of the tuition data indicated no differences in full-time in-district tuition. Significant differences were found to exist in full-time in-state and out-of-state tuition. Post hoc analyses identified significant differences in full-time in-state tuition between suburban colleges and their town and rural counterparts. Differences were also identified in full-time out-of-state tuition between and among city and suburban colleges and their town and rural counterparts. Specifically, the full-time out-of-state tuition rates for town colleges differed from those of city and suburban institutions. Suburban colleges also differed from rural institutions. Analyses of the college affordability index data set indicated that significant differences do not exist among CAIs based on urban-centric locales.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究根据美国国家教育统计中心(National Center for Education Statistics)维护的综合中学后数据系统(IPEDS)提取的城市化标准制定的美国公立社区大学之间的学费率和大学负担能力指数(CAI)之间的差异。 NCES),在美国(US)教育部下运作。该研究为美国公立社区大学的全日制,课税区学费,州内学费,州外学费和CAI编制了数据库。该研究通过制度化城市化程度比较了选定的美国公立社区大学之间的全日制学费,州内学费,州外学费和CAI。使用多因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验假设。当方差分析表明数据之间存在统计差异时,采用事后检验。对学费数据的分析表明,全日制学区学费没有差异。发现全日制州内和州外学费存在显着差异。事后分析发现,郊区大学与城镇和农村的同行在全日制州内学费方面存在显着差异。在城市和郊区学院与城市和乡村学院之间的全日制州外学费中也发现了差异。具体来说,城镇大学的全日制州外学费与城市和郊区的大学不同。郊区大学也不同于农村机构。对大学负担能力指数数据集的分析表明,基于城市中心地区的CAI之间不存在显着差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Glover, Louis Charles.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas A&M University - Commerce.;

  • 授予单位 Texas A&M University - Commerce.;
  • 学科 Education Community College.Education Curriculum and Instruction.Education Finance.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 105 p.
  • 总页数 105
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号