首页> 外文学位 >Binding MOAD (Mother of All Databases).
【24h】

Binding MOAD (Mother of All Databases).

机译:绑定MOAD(所有数据库之母)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Binding MOAD (Mother of All Databases) is the largest collection of high-quality, protein-ligand complexes available from the Protein Data Bank. At this time, Binding MOAD contains 11,368 protein-ligand complexes composed of 3583 unique protein families and 5363 unique ligands. We have searched the crystallography papers for all structures and compiled binding data for 3543 (31%) of the protein-ligand complexes. The binding-affinity data ranges 13 orders of magnitude. This is the largest collection of structural binding data to date in the literature.;This database of protein-ligand complexes is proving very useful in exploring biophysical patterns of molecular recognition and enzymatic regulation. Mining Binding MOAD has revealed physical differences in how enzymes and nonenzymes bind small molecules. High-affinity ligands of enzymes are much larger than those with low affinity, but high- and low-affinity ligands of nonenzymes are the same size. This suggests that different approaches may be appropriate for improving the affinity of ligands. While the addition of complementary functional groups is likely to improve the affinity of an enzyme inhibitor, it may not be as fruitful for ligands of nonenzymes. For nonenzymes, small changes and isosteric replacements might be more productive. Furthermore, nonenzymes were found to have higher ligand efficiencies. The different efficiencies are not due to differences in the physicochemical properties of the ligands; instead, the amino-acid composition of the pockets are very different despite very similar distributions of amino acids in the overall protein sequences.;This study aims to address the issue of protein flexibility upon ligand binding. The influence of ligand binding on protein flexibility is examined by analyzing a large number of proteins crystallized with and without ligands. A baseline comparison of the natural variation of protein structure with and without ligands is first established, and then differences between the apo and holo are analyzed. It is shown that, in general, ligand binding stabilizes the protein and results in a smaller backbone root mean square deviation (RMSD) among holo-protein structures, compared the backbone RMSD of the apo-protein structures. Furthermore, the holo structures appear to sample a smaller subset of the space inhabited by apo structures, because the difference between apo and holo structures is smaller than variation seen among apo structures themselves. The size of the bound ligand does not appear to matter in determining the rigidification. While ligand binding generally does not induce large changes in the backbone, they are significant. Ligand binding does have distinct impact on the active site, as revealed by all-atom, active-site RMSD and the range of chi1 variation. Apo structures are observed to have a certain range of flexibility in their active sites, just as holo structures have a similar, but smaller, degree of variation among their active sites. However, greater variation has been found between these two groups as opposed to within either group by themselves. This suggests that ligand binding induces active-site side chains to occupy a different conformational space before and after binding. The influence on the active site could not be easily attributed to features such as ligand size, resolution, protein function, or catalytic composition.;The studies above illustrate the usefulness of large carefully annotated datasets for studying protein-ligand interactions. Binding MOAD has almost doubled in size since it was originally introduced in 2004, demonstrating steady growth with each annual update. Several technologies are described, such as natural language processing, that help drive this constant expansion.;In summary, Binding MOAD is a valuable resource. It has helped to illuminate fundamental differences between enzymes and nonenzymes and allowed for examination of the influence ligand binding has in protein flexibility. It has great potential to further advance our understanding of protein-ligand interactions.
机译:Binding MOAD(所有数据库之母)是可从蛋白质数据库获得的最大数量的高质量蛋白质-配体复合物。此时,Binding MOAD包含11368个蛋白质-配体复合物,该复合物由3583个独特的蛋白质家族和5363个独特的配体组成。我们搜索了所有结构的晶体学文件,并汇编了3543(31%)的蛋白质-配体复合物的结合数据。结合亲和力数据的范围为13个数量级。这是迄今为止文献中最大的结构结合数据收集。该蛋白质-配体复合物数据库在探索分子识别和酶促调控的生物物理模式方面非常有用。挖掘结合MOAD揭示了酶和非酶结合小分子的物理差异。酶的高亲和力配体比具有低亲和力的酶大得多,但非酶的高亲和力和低亲和力配体大小相同。这表明不同的方法可能适合于改善配体的亲和力。尽管添加互补的官能团可能会改善酶抑制剂的亲和力,但对于非酶的配体来说可能没有那么富有成效。对于非酶,小的改变和等排代换可能会更有效率。此外,发现非酶具有更高的配体效率。不同的效率不是由于配体的物理化学性质的差异。相反,尽管氨基酸在整个蛋白质序列中的分布非常相似,但口袋中的氨基酸组成却有很大差异。本研究旨在解决配体结合后蛋白质柔韧性的问题。配体结合对蛋白质柔韧性的影响是通过分析大量有无配体结晶的蛋白质来检查的。首先建立具有和不具有配体的蛋白质结构自然变化的基线比较,然后分析载脂蛋白和全环蛋白之间的差异。结果表明,与脱辅基蛋白质结构的骨架RMSD相比,配体结合通常能稳定蛋白质并导致整体蛋白质结构之间的骨架根均方差(RMSD)较小。此外,全息结构似乎对载脂蛋白结构所占据的空间的较小子集进行了采样,因为载脂蛋白和全息结构之间的差异小于载脂蛋白结构本身之间的差异。结合的配体的大小在确定刚性中似乎无关紧要。虽然配体结合通常不会引起主链的大变化,但它们是重要的。配体结合确实对活性位点产生了显着影响,如全原子,活性位点RMSD和chi1变异范围所揭示的。观察到Apo结构在其活性位点具有一定范围的柔韧性,就像整个结构在其活性位点之间具有相似但较小的变化程度一样。然而,发现这两组之间的差异更大,而不是单独出现在两组之间。这表明配体结合在结合之前和之后诱导活性位点侧链占据不同的构象空间。对活性位点的影响不易归因于诸如配体大小,分辨率,蛋白质功能或催化成分等特征。;以上研究表明,精心注释的大型数据集对于研究蛋白质-配体相互作用是有用的。自从2004年首次引入Binding MOAD以来,其规模几乎增加了一倍,这表明其每年的更新都在稳定增长。描述了多种技术,例如自然语言处理,这些技术有助于推动这种不断扩展。总之,绑定MOAD是宝贵的资源。它有助于阐明酶和非酶之间的根本差异,并有助于检查配体结合对蛋白质柔韧性的影响。它具有极大的潜力,可以进一步增进我们对蛋白质-配体相互作用的理解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Benson, Mark.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Biology Bioinformatics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 126 p.
  • 总页数 126
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号